Talk:IB Biology/Cells

spambot clobbered content
This happened several months ago & there have been many changes since:

This is the diff showing what it did

Perhaps someone more familiar with the subject can determine if any of the content still needs to be restored (undo doesn't work). --Versageek 08:07, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Not got time now but I will take a look later and see if I can help - cheers -- Herby talk thyme 08:09, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * With apologies - looking at it not a subject I feel able to help with - sorry -- Herby talk thyme 13:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Oddly, I actually know this subject material - I had to read it a few times before it came back to me.. it's been more than a few years since my last A&P class.. I overwrote some newer material when I resored, but the old content on the the subject was better. --Versageek 06:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

"tipos de celulas"?!
Can we change the graphic depicting the differences between prokaryotes and eukaryotes to one in English? It's not that big of a deal.

205.215.177.155 (talk) 19:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Cell Theory
Some of the exceptions to the cell theory aren't really exceptions. Multi-nucleated cells are still cells.

I'd also like to see support on that statement "Some biologists consider unicellular organisms to be acellular."

I suppose you need to add a definition of a cell.

Corrected your misspelling of Schwann as Swan. Here is the wikipedia entry for it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Schwann

Rozzychan 21:56, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Right. And one reason exceptions seem necessary is that part 5 about DNA is not actually part of the cell theory.63.249.108.159 (talk) 23:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I LOVE FLOWER BOY RAMYUN SHOP!!! 121.54.54.37 (discuss) 12:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

biology
I have some question Tashi dema (discuss • contribs) 13:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)