Talk:God for the Third Millennium/Deus ex machina

Accurate?
In the second paragraph it says that "Jehovah presented himself in the human form to Moses . . .". In the Bible at any rate it doesn’t seem to say anything about whether God/Jehovah was in human form, so maybe this should be reworded. Myrryam 14:11, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

God for the Third Millennium:Deus ex machina (comment
Are we being objective here, can you realy ignore the views of over one billion Moslims. If you dont have accurate information about the faith, then please state the fact.

Christian slant?
I don't mean to be rude, and I identify as a Christian, but it seems to me that this section is very much into the Christian viewpoint, and not so much with anything else. I'd like to take out or attribute as Christian belief some of the more blatant stuff (references to Jesus as God's Only Son, performing miracles, etc), but I'm not sure of how much to do, or how to seperate it. Maybe I'm just being silly and unwilling to completely delete someone's hard work.

My $.02

--Jujo 17:17, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I think this text is beyond repair. It is the typical state of a Monotheism: To narrowminded, uninformed. If he/she informed then he/she whould know that neiter Hinduism nor Budism are considered a Monotheism. That makes 2 of the to 5 religions. Personaly I belive that the Monotheism is a dead end - the universe is just to big for one God and this book is just one more attempt to rescue what canot be rescued. --Krischik T 14:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC)