Talk:God for the Third Millennium/Creation of life on the Earth

Pre-DNA evolution
The unlikeliness of emergence of DNA Protozoa by chance makes this hypothesis unscientific. The theories of origins of life thus rely on a pre-DNA stage of evolution, perhaps even several stages, of which the DNA life is a byproduct that finally incorporated the previous stages. What life needs are evolution-capable replicators. DNA/protein life was very likely predecesed by RNA life, as RNA molecules are capable of self-catalysis.

=
What is meant by How the DNA was created in exact sequence, it is found?

Let us say I have a trillion dices and throw it, they will land up in some sequence. Now if I ask how the dices were arranged in the sequence we found them to be. From probability, we know that this sequence has little probability and to get the same sequence again I will require more time than my life. Does that mean that dices were arranged by some other intelligent being and not by chance?

The great number of outcomes and very little probability does not negate a event that occurred in past.

It is fact that genetic code was created in some form in past. It is also fact that it could have been created in some other form. However, little probability does not negate that event. Initially it did evolve into what it is today.

Evolution isn't about the creation of life.
Evolution is about the change of species over time, it doesn't posit how life was created in the first place. AFAIK, scientists aren't yet really sure how the conversion of non-life to life occured.

I should also point out that being a creationist doesn't require believing in the Bible (the most obvious counter-example is probably jews). Irrevenant 10:11, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Why not taking a look on what the Holy Qur'an states about creation?
I noticed that the Writer kept on mentioning Judaism and Christianity as if they were the only Monotheistic Religions found on Earth. He didn't mention any about Islam as the third global religion which calls people to worship God the One in the most purest Monotheistic form without considering any sons or partners, without Images of God, while ensuring on God's Unlikliness to anything.

Islam offers too the best description of Creation, considering the Big Bang and the expected shrink of the Universe.

In Muslim faith too, God do not take a physical form to find a 'place' of a throne the universe we live in. It just states it as what the Holy Qur'an says: {(He is) the Creator of the heavens and the earth: He has made for you pairs from among yourselves, and pairs among cattle: by this means does He multiply you: there is nothing whatever like unto Him, and He is the One that hears and sees (all things).} [Holy Qur'an 42:11]

The Holy Qur'an talks about the incomplete spherical shape of planet Earth. It talks too about the Earthly atmosphere and the huge Universe outside it, besides pointing to the huge universal celestial bodies and its complicated organized patterns.

When putting the foregoing besides the fact which states that Islam accepts and respects the books and the prophets of the two previous Monotheistic religions, i.e: Judaism and Christianity: So it is logical to consider Islam when talking about Creation or about God in Human History, as the last and the most informative form of Monotheism on Earth. Nouruddeen Mahmoud 20:11, 2 February 2006 (GMT)

what about the AP?
I think before diving into speculation about aliens planting seeds, the god for the third millenium could really really use a quality treatment of the anthropic principle.