Talk:Games

Different book title
This book really needs to have a more descriptive title. Single-word titles are almost always a problem, as they either show that the book has an ill-defined topic or fail to describe the topic. Just for good measure, there's also a technical awkwardness because there is a Subject:Games with associated subject-category Category:Games, interfering with the most naturally expected name for the book-category.

Take a look at the info on starting a new book at Using Wikibooks. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 01:08, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What would be a better title? StudiesWorld (discuss • contribs) 21:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The title depends on the scope. What topic is the book intended to cover?  One of the reasons an over-general title is bad is that it may be a symptom of an over-general scope.  I'm not sure what you intend here, really.  If you're going to cover every game ever created, you need to have an angle, an aspect of games that makes this a book rather than an encyclopedia.  We have entire books about some games, already; see Subject:Games.


 * You might do a once-through of WB:WIW, to get a feel for it, and there may be some good advice in Using Wikibooks (which is itself a featured book).


 * What do you have in mind for this book? --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 22:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * An overview and history of games and game related topics.StudiesWorld (discuss • contribs) 01:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I admit I'm not sure what to do with that. Something with the word "overview" in it, or "survey", or some such?  Perhaps it may become clearer as the content develops.  :-S  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 20:48, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Interlingual Energizers
Hello everyone,

For those who are interested: I'm working on a book on Interlingual Energizers. Any feedback would be great. -- T.seppelt (discuss • contribs) 07:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)