Talk:Fukushima Aftermath: Diablo Nuclear Redux?/Mothers for Peace/Archive 1

FYI form Edit history
Reproduced from the edit history: (cur | prev) 11:06, 17 June 2011 LSeeley (discuss | contribs) (empty) (I have removed this page because it contains inaccurate information and the author is not a member of Mothers for Peace nor authorized to contribute to Wiki under our name.) (undo) (cur | prev) 01:21, 17 June 2011 QuiteUnusual (discuss | contribs) (5,763 bytes) (Change rejected. You don't need to be a member of an organisation to be authorised to write about them. Censorship, however, is prohibited at Wikibooks) (undo) [automatically checked] (cur | prev) 23:21, 16 June 2011 LSeeley (discuss | contribs) (5,762 bytes) (The author of this piece is not a member of Mothers for Peace and is not authorized to write commentary regarding Mothers for Peace.) (undo)

Comment
Please note the vandalism warning on the discussion page of LSeeley. Note also there is not here, nor in any other venue, anywhere, ever, any contention to be writing or acting under the name of or under authorization by San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace. It seems quite odd that this is not understood. Please make any needed corrections.

I would like to acknowledge at least that if the LSeeley account is in fact an account of the SLOMFP Board Member Linda Seeley, that is more legitimate IMO than anonymous posting underr IP number. The WIkipedia article of same name was vandalized from an Atascadero account number which was traced to charter.net. According to my recollection, SLOMFP Board Member Seeley, who is also as I recall part of the local Sierra CLub board, is a charter.net account. It is surprising that this kind of incorrect wiki conduct is occurring but I have high hopes that it will in fact cease and desist.

For the benefit of RR, QU and other observers, it is a matter of public record that SLOMFP in their four contentions are seeking access to nuclear secrets regarding terrorist preparedness. As a COI disclosure, I had myself attended SLOMFP meetings and a faction on their board objected and has been rather vitriolically trying to establish that I was never a "member". My analysis is that they believe that the Atomic Safety Licensing Board would be less likely to grant them security clearance if they are associated with any person who is not known to the SLOMFP Board and who is a middle class "Mom" type person. In other words my analysis is that they think any connection to me might hurt their security clearance. But I have never in any way asserted membership in SLOMFP, nor denied it. It is a tempest in a teapot of their own making. I just work here and could care less one way or another about the ASLB and their lawsuit. But that is all there is to it.

I will continue to work in an NPOV manner on all WMF projects. Frankly, Scarlet, I don't give a damn one way or another about this organization. The only reason I include information on them is to be consistent with NPOV and comprehensiveness and I will be happy enough if they will either abide by WMF rules, or go away. &#91;&#91;User:Geof Bard गीता&#93;&#93; (discuss • contribs) 23:47, 18 June 2011 (UTC)