Talk:Foundations and Assessment of Education/Edition 1/Foundations Table of Contents/Chapter 6/Experts Take Sides

author reflection
The main topic of my article was the "No Child Left Behind" program. I received some helpful feedback from the person who reviewed my article. One of the points made in the feedback was that some of my sources may have had some bias. What I learned from this is as follows: if an article is peer-reviewed, this does not mean that the article is without bias. I thought that using a mostly peer-reviewed sources would help me to steer completely clear of bias in my research. In retrospect, I think using a majority of peer-reviewed sources was good. However, if I ever decide to research this topic in more depth and provide a research paper of a higher quality, I am going to have to work harder to find sources even within peer-reviewed journals that have minimum amount of bias.

The topic of NCLB is a rich topic and as times passes, this legislation is going to evolve. So if I am going to continue research on this subject in the future, I am also going to have to keep in touch with how the legislation is being critiqued and modified.

Mbrowder (talk) 16:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)



Students: Please write your "Reader Responses" on this page.



Below are links to pages on which you can provide peer reviews for this article.

Remember that each peer review page should contain only one peer review.

Peer Review One

Peer Review Two