Talk:Foundations and Assessment of Education/Edition 1/Foundations Table of Contents/Chapter 13/Chapter FAQ/Peer Review Two

PEER REVIEW FEEDBACK
 * Use this template to grade the peer reviews you receive.

Directions

-
 * Use this rubric to evaluate EACH peer review you receive for your article.
 * You will award points for each of the sections in this rubric.
 * Write the scores below in the section called "Scores".
 * Your evaluation will determine your reviewer's grade for this assignment; please take your time and grade honestly and fairly.

SCORES

 * Includes all components:                30 / 30
 * Reflects Standards or Criteria:         5/ 5


 * Understandable:                         5/ 5


 * Specific:                               4 / 5


 * Achievable:                             4 / 5

TOTAL SCORE:                              48 /50

Comments (1 + 1)
Provide ONE compliment and ONE suggestion for your peer reviewer. For example, what did you find most or least effective? What would make the feedback more effective?

I think that this peer reviewer did an excellent job of reviwing my article. It was easy to understand, and gave me specific details that I could use to improve my article. However, I am having a hard time with one of the suggestions that was given. The suggestion was that I should add more opinions and personal touches to the article. I can see more of that in the other types of special feature articles, but have a hard time putting a lot of opinions and such in the Chapter FAQ. Alucy001 (talk) 01:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)