Talk:Foundations and Assessment of Education/Edition 1/Foundations Table of Contents/Chapter 13/Chapter FAQ/Peer Review One

PEER REVIEW FEEDBACK

Untitled

 * Use this template to grade the peer reviews you receive.

Directions

-
 * Use this rubric to evaluate EACH peer review you receive for your article.
 * You will award points for each of the sections in this rubric.
 * Write the scores below in the section called "Scores".
 * Your evaluation will determine your reviewer's grade for this assignment; please take your time and grade honestly and fairly.

SCORES

 * Includes all components:                30 / 30
 * Reflects Standards or Criteria:         5 / 5


 * Understandable:                         5 / 5


 * Specific:                               4 / 5


 * Achievable:                             4 / 5

TOTAL SCORE:                              48 /50

Comments (1 + 1)
Provide ONE compliment and ONE suggestion for your peer reviewer. For example, what did you find most or least effective? What would make the feedback more effective?

I really appreciated the comments made by the peer reviewer. I felt that they are very achievable and will certainly do my best to improve my article. I thought that the most effective comment was that I should expand my FAQ page. I felt that I covered all bases, but I can now see that there is room for more relevant information.

With this being a FAQ page, I have a hard time putting in a lot of my own thoughts/opinions. Perhaps a section at the bottom would remedy this by giving me an opportunity to express my thoughts but still keeping the FAQ clean and free of opinions or bias.

Alucy001 (talk) 01:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)