Talk:FOSS Licensing

License problems
I highly appreciate that this books is double-licences, but there is a problem with maintaining this state. There are always contributors that make small edits, like fixing spelling mistakes; they might not see main page of this book (eg. they may come from Google here) and do not know about double-licensing. Should we assume that such contributors agree also to terms of CC-BY-SA license? I have some doubts.

I am not familiar with rules of multi-licensing developed at Wikipedia; perhaps there is a ready solution for this problem. --Derbeth talk 08:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Modifications of this work
I found some things that may be obsolete or just missing. Should I go ahead and add those stuff? Should I create a "annotation box" for these added things instead? (If so, how do you create a "annotation box" anyways?) --24.207.85.220 (talk) 18:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)