Talk:Ethical Debates in Connected Culture 2019/Sensitive Topics 1: Violence

Welcome to your essay discussion page. Please log all discussion for the essay here, as instructed in the workshops and assessment briefs.
 * GregXenon01 (discuss • contribs) 15:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Diane820 (discuss • contribs) 23:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Our group has determined that the theme is cyber violence. Do you agree? Nicole0000119 (discuss • contribs) 23:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC) I agree with you. Because the phenomenon of Internet violence is very common, for example, a few months ago, the Korean star suicide, Internet violence is flowing, so this is a good topic

Diane820 (discuss • contribs) 23:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Cyber violence is a form of violence with serious harm and bad influence. It is a kind of slander, defamation, defamation and inflammatory speech published on the Internet. Using words, pictures, videos and other forms to attack others on the Internet, people are used to call it "cyber violence". Network violence can cause reputation damage to the parties, and it has broken the moral bottom line, often accompanied by violations and criminal acts, which need to be standardized by means of education, moral restraint, law and other means. Network violence is the violence of Internet users on the network, and the extension of social violence on the network. If Internet users want to obtain the right of free expression, they should also take on the mission of maintaining network civilization and morality, at least, they should maintain the necessary rationality and objectivity. TA said Nicole0000119 (discuss • contribs) 23:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Internet violence, including the virtual space of others to abuse, insult to achieve the attack behavior, also including the dissemination of all kinds of bloody, killing, knife fights and other vicious fighting scenes video, audio, pictures and other ACTS. These violent information not only satisfies some people's abreact behavior through the virtual space, but also becomes the object of teenagers' imitation in reality. Diane820 (discuss • contribs) 23:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC) What research methods do we use to study this topic? Nicole0000119 (discuss • contribs) 23:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Use questionnaire or interview? Diane820 (discuss • contribs) 23:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Which group do we choose? Nicole0000119 (discuss • contribs) 23:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC) The stars, or the teenagers, do you agree Diane820 (discuss • contribs) 23:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Stars may not be easy to achieve Nicole0000119 (discuss • contribs) 23:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC) We can refer to star's previous interview programs about Internet violence Diane820 (discuss • contribs) 23:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC) That's a good idea Diane820 (discuss • contribs) 23:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC) So, which age group do we choose to interview? Baizihao123 (discuss • contribs) 23:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC) I found a very useful article that you can refer to, it ishttps://info.sice.indiana.edu/~herring/violence.html Baizihao123 (discuss • contribs) 23:47, 15 November 2019 (UTC) I think the online violence of stars can only be taken as a case study Nicole0000119 (discuss • contribs) 23:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Not only teenagers, but also adults, such as office workers, married people. They also have a lot of time to contact the network. Diane820 (discuss • contribs) 23:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC) There are too many people in that group, which is not conducive to the statistics Baizihao123 (discuss • contribs) 23:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC) The content of violence I think can be divided into the definition of violence, the phenomenon of violence, the category of violence, the impact of violence Nicole0000119 (discuss • contribs) 23:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC) In my opinion, a large number of respondents will be more convincing and more specific. If the group is too small, it is not representative. Diane820 (discuss • contribs) 23:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC) I agree with you, but I'm sure we'll see more in our writing Baizihao123 (discuss • contribs) 00:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC) yes,We can also discuss cyber violence with different groups of people, such as children, old people and young people. It is a common phenomenon that violence against women accounts for a large proportion of Internet violence Nicole0000119 (discuss • contribs) 00:04, 16 November 2019 (UTC) Then, our follow-up paper will mainly study the definition, classification and influence of cyber violence, and the survey scope will be teenagers and adults, and the questionnaire survey or interview method will be used to conduct the research.

hey guys, some excellent discussion do far. You have raised a number of relevant points and EACH of these could be developed in rich and productive ways. What I would advise at this stage is to look at the way this discussion has been formatted so far. Because of the number of ideas and contributions, it might be useful for you to copy the above two paragraphs and paste into a new section below, with each point on a separate line. This will help you to untangle the issues and start to follow the thread of each point in turn. From there, you can then more easily decide which are the more important points to focus on, and which are less important (but worth mentioning in the course of your essay). GregXenon01 (discuss • contribs) 14:22, 16 November 2019 (UTC) ～～～～ @GregXenon01，Do you have any good articles to recommend us.

Chen's collection Dark Web Exploring and Data Mining the Dark Side of the Web which is available in the library online catalogue and has a number of case studies that relate quite closely to the areas you discuss particularly around extremism etc. These are sensitive topics, but as I say, you only need to conduct secondary research for the purposes of this essay. Also: Hacking: the art of exploitation by Jon Erickson is a very different perspective, but has a short introduction which is useful for rethinking the function of hacking from an historical point of view, as not only cybercriminality and violent acts, but also from ethical procedural angles too. Finally, if you type "violence" into the library online catalogue, it will display a number of key texts from philosophical and theoretical perspectives that might be useful in your discussion. Happy reading! GregXenon01 (discuss • contribs) 15:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Diane820 (discuss • contribs) 11:20, 29 November 2019 (UTC) Nicole just uploaded our group's paper. The introduction of the paper, the definition, nature and classification of cyber violence are completed by me. You check that your parts are intact. Nicole0000119 (discuss • contribs) 11:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC) Manifestations of Cyber Violence and having of Cyber Violence written by me, is already written and upload. Nicole0000119 (discuss • contribs) 11:27, 29 November 2019 (UTC) The rest is done by bai

INSTRUCTOR FEEDBACK: COLLABORATIVE ESSAY
Grade Description for Collaborative Essay:

Collaborative Essays of this standard roughly correspond to the following grade descriptor. Depending on where your actual mark is in relation to the making criteria as outlined in the relevant documentation, it should give you an idea of strengths and weaknesses within the achieved grade band overall:


 * Merit. Among other things, work of this standard will make a clear point in a clear way. It will relate concepts to original examples in a straightforward fashion. It will make effective use of the possibilities of the form (including links, as well as perhaps copyright-free videos and images, linked to from Wiki Commons). This work will demonstrate attainment of virtually all intended learning outcomes, clearly grounded on close familiarity with a wide range of supporting evidence, constructively utilised to reveal appreciable depth of understanding. The wiki markup formatting will be very clear.

General: In addition to the common marking scheme, there are three broad criteria widely employed in the Division, which are used to help assessors evaluate your work in a more general sense:

Quality of research: is there evidence of critical engagement with set materials?; is there evidence of independent reading of appropriate academic and peer-reviewed material? For this element, your work has been evaluated as: Merit

Originality of thought: Is argument well-articulated and well-supported?; is there evidence of critical thinking (through taking a position in relation to key ideas from the module, and supporting this position)?; is there evidence of relational thinking (through making connections between key ideas from the module and wider literature, and supporting these connections)?; is there evidence of independent critical ability? For this element, your work has been evaluated as: Merit

Clarity of expression: academic writing style and structure, and organisational skills For this element, your work has been evaluated as: Merit

Specific Feedback:


 * You have submitted a fairly well written response to the brief. Here you outline a number of arguments that specifically address the theme of violence in relation to different kinds of cyberbullying. Your discussion of the research evidences a familiarity and good working knowledge of a range of scholarship on your chosen topic. The example that you have chosen to discuss your theme is fairly well-chosen because of its public visibility and relevance. It is really well read and researched, and there is a sense of flow between sections here which is difficult to achieve in collaborative writing, so well done.


 * The essay is written in a fairly fluid and accessible style, and your argument is very well structured generally, is critically engaged, and you have demonstrated some awareness of the contradictions inherent in the theme itself. This is good work. I would have liked to have seen a little more creativity with the wiki markup and formatting to make more of the platform's affordances. As this stands, it is a little chunky, and text-heavy, and therefore would have been lightened through a little further formatting such as embedded images and video.

'''N.B.: Feedback for your individual Essay Discussion Page contribs elements for the assessment will be given on your individual User Discussion Pages. That individual feedback should be considered in relation to the feedback here, because of the fundamentally connected nature of the two tasks. Grades for all work will communicated confidentially via Canvas.'''

GregXenon01 (discuss • contribs) 12:15, 19 December 2019 (UTC)