Talk:Environmental theory and collection of ideas

The Further Readings sections are not necessary, just put here in order to avoid the suspicion of plagiarism, however, many of them were not even read by the original author. In case, however, when the Further Readings sections add new arguments to support the theory described in this book - or in other words, proof by authority - they can be very useful, so adding more of them is encouraged too.

Today I've corrected some errors I've found inappropriate for WikiBooks, if you find more, you can notify me or correct it directly.

The other error in my writings (noticed by WikiPedians) is too formal language... I did not know that my language is formal, but it's probably because my native language is not English, and although I learned English as a Second Language (ESL), it was British English, not American English. So, it would be the best to correct those errors yourself which you find objectionable, I can only correct those which are pointed as wrong.

Anyway, this book is not designed for WikiBooks, so please forgive if some parts of it do not seem to comply with the criteria yet, however, you can help (correct) that by deleting the objectionable parts, and I'll either leave them as they are (deleted), or look after a better (and encyclopedic) way to express them.

By the way, someone has edited: "to be more comprehensive by explaining modern environmental protection issues"... shouldn't it be "to be more comprehensive in explaining modern environmental protection issues"...? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fekarp (discuss • contribs) 11:22, 22 May 2014‎


 * Books are encouraged to develop their own style guidelines to help contributors to use a consistent style, which can include the use of formal language and British English. I wouldn't worry about trying to express things like an encyclopedia because books should aim to instruct/teach people about a topic, and Wikibooks is not an encyclopedia. Books can teach people about existing and planned research topics that have been documented by reliable sources, but people's original ideas for protecting the environment is appropriate at Wikiversity rather then at Wikibooks.
 * You can change the wording in the forward, if you like, as you have already done in other ways. --dark lama  17:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Okay, maybe it is safer to entirely remove some parts of this book, in order to make the place of the other parts more secure. As for style, I do not care much, but my sister said that it is better to use "It is" than "It's" in written English. So I think I'll quickly do some improvements fit for WikiBooks, but actually, I thought that WikiBooks is a place to upload the first version of my book, and the community will do the rest. By the way, it is me who might have the most ideas to improve this book, just I have no time for it as I do not want to suffer while the others enjoy life.