Talk:Digital Media and Culture Yearbook 2014/'''Chapter 3: Always-on Culture'''

Hey guys. I was wondering if we should include sub headings within the Main concepts section for each concept ? Was thinking it would be a good way to organize the different concepts? What do you guys think ? (Kaf00023 (discuss • contribs) 22:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC))

Hey. I agree, I think having subheadings will make the page look more organised and professional. I think that we should start with a detailed description of the actual idea of Always-On Culture and then move on to Turkle and Boyd's ideas, each under their own subheading. What does everyone think? Also, is there something obvious I have missed? KathrynHairUpAndGlasses (discuss • contribs) 15:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Should we change the main concepts to be more a section for each thinker than each concepts, or just add each of the main thinkers at the end or start of the section ? (Kaf00023 (discuss • contribs) 22:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC))

Hi guys. I wanted to put in something about the fact that teenagers are more associated with "always-on culture" than any other group of people. Any suggestions of where, under which sub-heading, I should put it? Thanks! KathrynHairUpAndGlasses (discuss • contribs) 13:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

'reduced context cues' why the double bold here and not elsewhere? Try to be consistent with formatting :o) GregXenon01 (discuss • contribs) 15:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about the double bold on social context cues it was a mistake on my part when making the sub heading and i didn't notice the error till today, however I've fixed it now and will check more carefully next time. As for teenagers being more associated with 'always on culture' you could work it into the idea of being part of a network as they would presumably be the largest part of said network and the implications of that ? (Kaf00023 (discuss • contribs) 22:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC))

We should be sure to remain consistent with danah boyd's name. Some people are capitalising it when she is known for having it in lower case (even her Wikipedia page has it in lower case). (If anyone is dead against lower case just say here so everyone knows to put it like that). Thanks! SiobhanDMC (discuss • contribs) 16:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Should we capitalize boyd's name when it is in the beginning of the sentence? --Kelly.marvel (discuss • contribs) 17:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Good idea about putting the idea about teenagers being more associated with always on in the networking section. Thanks. I think if her name is lower case even on her Wikipedia page that we should keep it lower case throughout. KathrynHairUpAndGlasses (discuss • contribs) 18:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

I've noticed that there are several different ways that we are saying "Always-On Culture". Some have upper and lower case, some all upper case, some all lower case and some are in and some are out of quotations. I think they should all be the same, with perhaps the exception of the first time it should be in upper case. Do you think it should have "" quotations or ''? KathrynHairUpAndGlasses (discuss • contribs) 18:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

I agree Kathryn that we need to be a bit more consistent in the formatting of the words "Always On Culture". In the module handbook and all our other course material the topic is refered to as 'Always On' Culture - with the culture aspect being titled as 'Always On' not an entire clause phrase and capitalising the C in 'Culture'. I hope that's helpful, what do others think? LittleBlondeLottie (discuss • contribs)

I think we should go with what the handbook says. Also, are we putting the references in alphabetical order? Do you think it would look better or do you think they should be in line with where they are in the text? As in, if the reference comes first in the text should it come first in the reference list? KathrynHairUpAndGlasses (discuss • contribs) 19:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Hey guys, I was wondering for referencing, if we were to use the ref tags or not? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/RefCodeHandout.pdf Amandajayner (discuss • contribs) 19:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)