Talk:Constructivist Theories in Education

Shouldn't this be in Psychology? --Daniel 10:59, 5 May 2004 (UTC)

Not unless it is a section on Educational Psychology. Typically, this topic is house in Schools of Education, which are housed in the Social Sciences. How does one vote to have a section moved - or does one, in a wiki environment? Should we just opt to move the page as we see fit? That would seem to fit in with the objective of a wiki environment, but I'm new to this and don't want to overstep my boundaries. - Jo Meyertons

How Humanity Learns
This module is correctly placed, in my opinion, in that the subject deals with learning as an empirical process based in a praxis of incremental mental growth. The Humanities take their queues from generations long passed. As learners and teachers, we merely ride upon a wave that is eternal...we didn't make it...it made us. JasperJenkins 08:01, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Constructivist? or Constructionist?
The article uses the term 'constructivist' and also 'constructionist'. Was this a typo? Or are they interchangeable terms?

No, not interchangable, Constructionism builds on Constructivism, see Papert "Situating Constructionism"

Swami Centre Link
Delete as spam?