Talk:Consciousness Studies/BioPsychoSociology

I don't like this, I think it should be checked up on.


 * There is a problem with a book of this type that may best be answered by an "Other explanations" section. RobinH 11:04, 6 April 2006 (UTC) PS: it is good to have another contributor around - have you thought of getting a userid?

This page is a joke. Get someone good to work over this entire "book." It is like a page written in 1996 by a sophomore undergrad who just took a single course by a biased prof. Seriously, the lack of neuroscience, the lack of data, it is awful. And the philosophy is awful. The Churchlands aren't eliminativists about consciousness. Read their actual work, not what people say about them. They are eliminativists about propositional attitudes, not consciousness (or mental representations more generally). This embodies the biases and ignorance of a blog entry. Very annoying, useless will not cite it in my book on consciousness. I am dumber having read any of this.

Please correct the text - this is a Wikibook. RobinH (talk) 22:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)