Talk:Circuit Idea/Why Creative Persons are Unhappy

I would like to start the discussion about relations between creative and ordinary thinking people by citing a short text that I have moved from the Wikipedia Virtual ground discussion page. Circuit-fantasist (talk) 17:58, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

(moved by Circuit-fantasist from Wikipedia Virtual ground discussion page)

...People (especially those that have managed to advance in life and to hold a high position) do not like someone (especially staying below them) to express own ideas even if they are more than obvious. This upsets their mental equilibrium and they react to this "intervention" trying to redress the balance exactly as an op-amp reacts to any intervention to virtual ground:) Contrary, people adopt willingly, use and benefit from nobody's ideas. I have known this truth from my experience since I have been bearing the reactions of people around me through my life... Circuit-fantasist 08:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

The text below is copied from Wikipedia Voltage-to-current converter talk page. Circuit-fantasist (talk) 18:15, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

... You and your likes have cognitive, emotional and moral problems predestining your behavior here, in Wikipedia. Your great problem is that you do not see the concepts behind circuits; you do not see the forest behind the trees. You know perfectly the specific circuit implementations but you can't generalize them into a functional block-diagram and a universal operational algorithm. Simply, you know circuits but you do not understand them; as a result, you can't explain them to readers so that they to understand them. The main reason for this behavior is your unwillingness to see the existing connection between apparently different phenomena (both electrical and non-electrical) in this world, to establish associations between them, to use analogies...

Besides this cognitive problem you have emotional problems as well. Actually, you do not like circuits; circuitry is more job than favorite pursuit for you. Contrary to you, I like circuits and great ideas behind them; I love them; I adore them. Circuitry is my vocation, my pet pursuit. I created this page three years ago with plenty of love placing all the best of my abilities here. To show the truth behind these legendary circuits, I show their evolution from passive to active version: first, I have introduced passive versions looking at Ohm's law from two points; then, I have considered their imperfections and finally, I have found a remedy converting the passive versions into active ones. Later, I realized that, in this form, the article did not match the specific encyclopedic Wikipedia style and it had to be rewritten. Then I gave this opportunity to wikipedians and began creating a series of Circuit idea stories about them (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). I agree with you the form has to be changed but the main points of the content have to be kept. As all you can (already) see, both the V-to-I and I-to-V op-amp inverting configurations are based on the same powerful Miller's idea - modifying (zeroing) the impedance by adding a proportional voltage. I have discerned this common great idea in these specific circuits and I would like to share this simple truth with people. Will you keep it in your "about 3 paragraphs"? No, you will remove it; you will remove the truth about these circuits and will leave only banal, specific and formal "explanations" that do not explain anything; you will hide the forest behind the trees.

You have boasted of your famous tutors at university. Well, it is wonderful that they were teaching perfectly circuit analysis to their alumni. But it would be also very well if they were showing concepts behind circuits and finally, if they were bringing up some elementary human ethics to them. Because, if you had such morals, when encountering a mind that excels (in some respect) yours, you would not consider his/her success as your unsuccess; you would not destroy else's creations or (worse) instigate stupidity and mediocrity to do this and then enjoy seeing the results... You would try to rise to his/her level instead to pull down him/her to your level; you would admire his/her achievements; you would join and improve them (what is the great Wikipedia idea); you would be wikipedian, not the opposite. If you respect the elementary Wikipedia ethics, you would restore the link to the most popular op-amp Miller integrator or current integrator in the Miller effect page that you have removed absolutely intentionally. Circuit dreamer...