Talk:Chess Opening Theory/1. d4/1...Nf6

I just created this page on 2. c4, but I wrote a fairly long intro. When I was a beginner, I was always confused as to why there were never any other options to 2. c4. I found it hard to believe 2. Nf3 could be so bad, or maybe 2. g3. I felt 2. c3 and 2. e3 were too passive, but I still wanted to know why 2. c4 was always played.

As I wrote, some of my material became an advertisement for why 1. d4 is a good choice. I realize this may not be the best place for it, but maybe I can move it over later.--JECompton 03:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Tone is incorrect for a wiki
This article needs to be revised and the conversational tone eliminated. That way, it would conform to the rest of the wiki.
 * Your welcome to edit. ChessCreator (talk) 09:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)