Talk:Chess/The Endgame/King and Two Major Pieces vs. King

Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but under "If other pieces are in the way," if one follows the moves up to the point: 7.Rh4+, how is 7.Rh4+ possible from the rooks position on G6? (5.Rxg5). It cannot be the other rook because of (3.Rh6...4.Rxg5...5.Rhg6...6.Ra6). Also, after 7.Rh4+, how is it that 7...Kc4 could follow? Black King would still be in check. Seems there is a misprint on the page..OR...quite possibly, a misreading on MY end (very possible as I'm not the quickest Knight in the cavalry!). Thanks, folks! Rehiggins (discuss • contribs) 14:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Oops, I misdid that series of moves. Fix it yourself, as I probably won't have time anytime soon. --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 17:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

How is the king forced away from the pawn?
In the section "If there's another piece in the way", I think there may be another missing step. Instead of 3...Kf3, couldn't black play 3...Kf4, still defending the pawn? I'd go ahead and fix it myself, but I can't actually figure out how. If you check the king with one of the rooks, he'll go right back to g4. --208.35.54.139 (discuss) 23:50, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Figured it out and made the changes. The problem was White moving 3.Rh6 instead of 3.Rg6. Black's king had never had any intention of going to the h-file, so parking the rook there just takes him out of the action. --208.35.54.139 (discuss) 01:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)