Talk:Canadian Criminal Procedure and Practice/Trials/Accused at Trial

Circular reasoning
The Circular reasoning of the exception of mentally ill is apparent to myself, and I hope you. The accuser, the psychiatrist gets to decide if the accused is "healthy" enough to appear in court.--Mark v1.0 (discuss • contribs) 14:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC) The correct link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning --Mark v1.0 (discuss • contribs) 14:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Specifically in the case of a "motion for confinement in a health services establishment", ARTICLE 30 OF THE CIVIL CODE 30.
 * Specifically in the case of a "motion for confinement in a health services establishment", ARTICLE 30 OF THE CIVIL CODE 30.

"Confinement in an institution following a psychiatric assessment may only be authorized by the court if both psychiatric reports conclude that confinement is necessary.

Even if that is the case, the court may not authorize confinement unless the court itself has serious reasons to believe that the person is dangerous and that the person's confinement is necessary, whatever evidence may be otherwise presented to the court and even in the absence of any contrary medical opinion."

I was medicated/drugged before the court date, interviewed by psychiatrist( for evidence for the motion for confinement) while medicated/drugged. My accuser got to drug and confine me before the court date, then on the court date, got my need to be present waved by the court when speaking on my behalf. Then during court provided false evidence that I could not contest. --Mark v1.0 (discuss • contribs) 16:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)