Talk:C++ Programming/TOC2

I have changed the TOC2. Please everyone contribute to fix the links. I am new to wiki and not very good in wiki editing.

Jayaram Ganapathy

discuss changes to the table of contents here

TOC 1 seems to have the most activity. Perhaps, this should and all other TOC's should be merged with it. However, since so much work has been done on TOC1, perhaps all others should just be deleted. Does anyone know if Wikibooks/Wikipedia has policies are forking modules? --Remi 12:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


 * TOC1 makes really sense to me 170.148.10.46


 * I'm not opposing in having 2 or more TOCs (this is a virtual environment) unless there is duplication of content several structures could exist in parallel, that is why I supported the creation of TOC2, we can even have several navigational schemes (that would take lots of work) all this would indeed improve the usability of the content, the problem that exist today is only on selecting what should be the main TOC (at least that is how I see it), I'm not asking for TOC2 to be deleted if the users continue to update it (sadly that seems not to be happening). --Panic 18:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Hellow friends, I have a suggestion. To improve TOC2 take the Introduction from TOC1. Include all the chapters except the comparison with C# JAVA etc without subheadings visible in the TOC2 page. Then merge the first two chapters Introduction and compilers you have now to that material. Change the Langage Essentials to C++ Language essentials

Regards,

Jayaram Ganapathy

Print Version of TOC2
I have Commented out the print version of TOC2 from the Editor's TOC, the actual print version has several divergences from what is on TOC2 some pages are on it others aren't and TOC2 has some pages that are on TOC1 missing, if someone should like to work on it add the option for printing on TOC2 and then revive the same option on editor's TOC. Txs. --Panic 19:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

C++ Programming/TOC2 deletion
A VFD on the TOC2 page was initiated (27 July 2008) and then closed (30 July 2008) by Mike.lifeguard, if Wikibookians wish to express concerns about the speedy action they can use this page, You may restate your points (or post part of the your discussion there). --Panic (talk) 00:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)