Talk:Biblical Studies/Christianity/John 4

Not Finalized
Findings: &#949;&#965;&#961;&#949;&#963;&#953;&#962;
 * The transition from Latin to Old English is a natural, thus the transition of Iesous from Greek to Latin to O.E. to English reaches an interesting juncture in Chapter 4. Jesus had foreign relations. Modernity opts (v. 7) for universal language at that point. The Coptic only starts in Chapter 2, first viable sacred name is a preview in 3: 10, unavoidably (the abbreviation IHC represents the unpronounceable name of God already) this shows a mixture of Greek and English translation, an awkward moment, but one of the earliest examples of superlineation and an Aramism of redundant verbage, all in three words, altogether fascinating. Latin makes it easier, Codex D starts at John 3: 16, first viable sacred name John 4: 1. The last leaves or pages in both codices are missing bringing the Latin phrases to a dramatic conclusion in Chapter 20 and 21, even more so the Aramaic in Chapter 20. Can you wait?
 * The preliminary heading was Greek/Latin Word pictures with the addition of Codex D, but that puts Latin on an equal basis with Greek. Findings in Chapter 3 touch on a more descriptive term, so the change to “plus Latin Facsimiles” outlining its tertiary and political role, behind Greek and Aramaic. &#45; Athrash | T a l k 01:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Made reference to Modernity Version Of the Gospel of John in offline essay as (MOV) where acronym was necessary. Will try to give attention to and complete translation slowly, but surely. &#45; Athrash | T a l k 20:48, 16 March 2014 (UTC)