Open Social Scholarship Annotated Bibliography/Complete Reference List

A

 * “Access2Research.” 2015. Access2Research. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access2Research.
 * Adema, Janneke. 2014. “Overview of Open Access Models for eBooks in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” OAPEN Project Report. https://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/file/a976330e-ed7a-4bd5-b0ed-47cab90e9a5e/1/ademaoapen2comb.pdf.
 * “African Copyright & Access to Knowledge Project.” 2016. African Copyright & Access to Knowledge Project. https://www.idrc.ca/en/project/african-copyright-and-access-knowledge-network-aca2k.org.
 * “Akada Network.” 2014. Akada Network. http://www.akadanetwork.org.
 * Akers, Katherine G., and Jennifer Doty. 2013. “Disciplinary Differences in Faculty Research Data Management Practices and Perspectives.” International Journal of Digital Curation 8 (2): 5–26. http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/263.
 * “Alliance for Taxpayer Access.” 2016. Alliance for Taxpayer Access. http://www.taxpayeraccess.org.
 * “Alliance of Science Organisations in Germany.” 2016. Alliance of German Science Organisations. Last modified April 26, 2016. http://www.dfg.de/en/dfg_profile/alliance/.
 * “American Academic & Scholarly Research Center.” 2014. American Academic & Scholarly Research Center. http://aasrc.org.
 * Anderson, Charles. 1998. “Universal Access—Free and Open Access—It Depends…” Reference & User Services Quarterly 38 (1): 25–27.
 * Andersen, Christian Ulrik, and Søren Bro Pold. 2014. “Post-digital Books and Disruptive Literary Machines.” Formules/Revue Des Creations Formelles et Littératures à Contraintes 18: 169–88.
 * Anderson, Colin R., and Stéphane M. McLachlan. 2015. “Transformative Research as Knowledge Mobilization: Transmedia, Bridges, and Layers.” Action Research, 14 (3): 295 – 317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750315616684.
 * Anokwa, Yaw, Carl Hartung, Waylon Brunette, Gaetano Boriello, and Adam Lerer. 2009. “Open Source Data Collection in the Developing World.” Computer 42 (10): 97–99. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=5280663&tag=1.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, Nina Belojevic, Tracey El Hajj, Randa El Khatib, Lindsey Seatter, and Raymond G. Siemens, with Alex Christie, Matthew Hiebert, Jon Saklofske, Jentery Sayers, Derek Siemens, Shaun Wong, and the INKE and ETCL Research Groups. 2017. “An Annotated Bibliography of Social Knowledge Creation.” In Social Knowledge Creation in the Humanities, edited by Alyssa Arbuckle, Aaron Mauro, and Daniel Powell, 29-264. Arizona: Iter Academic Press and Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, Nina Belojevic, Matthew Hiebert, and Raymond G. Siemens, with Alex Christie, Jon Saklofske, Jentery Sayers, Derek Siemens, Shaun Wong, and the INKE and ETCL Research Groups. 2014. “Social Knowledge Creation: Three Annotated Bibliographies.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (2). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/150/299.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, and Alex Christie, with the ETCL, INKE, and MVP Research Groups. 2015. “Intersections Between Social Knowledge Creation and Critical Making.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3): n.p. http://srconline.ca/index.php/src/article/view/200.
 * Anderson, Charles. 1998. “Universal Access—Free and Open Access—It Depends…” Reference & User Services Quarterly 38 (1): 25–27.
 * Andersen, Christian Ulrik, and Søren Bro Pold. 2014. “Post-digital Books and Disruptive Literary Machines.” Formules/Revue Des Creations Formelles et Littératures à Contraintes 18: 169–88.
 * Anderson, Colin R., and Stéphane M. McLachlan. 2015. “Transformative Research as Knowledge Mobilization: Transmedia, Bridges, and Layers.” Action Research, 14 (3): 295 – 317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750315616684.
 * Anokwa, Yaw, Carl Hartung, Waylon Brunette, Gaetano Boriello, and Adam Lerer. 2009. “Open Source Data Collection in the Developing World.” Computer 42 (10): 97–99. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=5280663&tag=1.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, Nina Belojevic, Tracey El Hajj, Randa El Khatib, Lindsey Seatter, and Raymond G. Siemens, with Alex Christie, Matthew Hiebert, Jon Saklofske, Jentery Sayers, Derek Siemens, Shaun Wong, and the INKE and ETCL Research Groups. 2017. “An Annotated Bibliography of Social Knowledge Creation.” In Social Knowledge Creation in the Humanities, edited by Alyssa Arbuckle, Aaron Mauro, and Daniel Powell, 29-264. Arizona: Iter Academic Press and Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, Nina Belojevic, Matthew Hiebert, and Raymond G. Siemens, with Alex Christie, Jon Saklofske, Jentery Sayers, Derek Siemens, Shaun Wong, and the INKE and ETCL Research Groups. 2014. “Social Knowledge Creation: Three Annotated Bibliographies.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (2). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/150/299.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, and Alex Christie, with the ETCL, INKE, and MVP Research Groups. 2015. “Intersections Between Social Knowledge Creation and Critical Making.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3): n.p. http://srconline.ca/index.php/src/article/view/200.
 * Anokwa, Yaw, Carl Hartung, Waylon Brunette, Gaetano Boriello, and Adam Lerer. 2009. “Open Source Data Collection in the Developing World.” Computer 42 (10): 97–99. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=5280663&tag=1.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, Nina Belojevic, Tracey El Hajj, Randa El Khatib, Lindsey Seatter, and Raymond G. Siemens, with Alex Christie, Matthew Hiebert, Jon Saklofske, Jentery Sayers, Derek Siemens, Shaun Wong, and the INKE and ETCL Research Groups. 2017. “An Annotated Bibliography of Social Knowledge Creation.” In Social Knowledge Creation in the Humanities, edited by Alyssa Arbuckle, Aaron Mauro, and Daniel Powell, 29-264. Arizona: Iter Academic Press and Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, Nina Belojevic, Matthew Hiebert, and Raymond G. Siemens, with Alex Christie, Jon Saklofske, Jentery Sayers, Derek Siemens, Shaun Wong, and the INKE and ETCL Research Groups. 2014. “Social Knowledge Creation: Three Annotated Bibliographies.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (2). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/150/299.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, and Alex Christie, with the ETCL, INKE, and MVP Research Groups. 2015. “Intersections Between Social Knowledge Creation and Critical Making.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3): n.p. http://srconline.ca/index.php/src/article/view/200.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, Nina Belojevic, Matthew Hiebert, and Raymond G. Siemens, with Alex Christie, Jon Saklofske, Jentery Sayers, Derek Siemens, Shaun Wong, and the INKE and ETCL Research Groups. 2014. “Social Knowledge Creation: Three Annotated Bibliographies.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (2). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/150/299.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, and Alex Christie, with the ETCL, INKE, and MVP Research Groups. 2015. “Intersections Between Social Knowledge Creation and Critical Making.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3): n.p. http://srconline.ca/index.php/src/article/view/200.
 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, and Alex Christie, with the ETCL, INKE, and MVP Research Groups. 2015. “Intersections Between Social Knowledge Creation and Critical Making.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3): n.p. http://srconline.ca/index.php/src/article/view/200.


 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, Alex Christie, and Lynne Siemens, eds. 2015. Special Issue, Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/issue/view/22


 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, Alex Christie, and Lynne Siemens, Aaron Mauro, and the INKE Research Group, eds. 2016. Special Issue, Scholarly and Research Communication 7 (2): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/issue/view/24.


 * Arbuckle, Alyssa, Constance Crompton, and Aaron Mauro, eds. 2014. Special Issue, Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/issue/view/18.


 * Asmah, Josephine. 2014. “International Policy and Practice on Open Access for Monographs.” Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences. http://www.ideas-idees.ca/sites/default/files/aspp-oa-appendix.pdf.


 * “Association for Computers and the Humanities.” n.d. Association for Computers and the Humanities. http://ach.org.


 * Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada-Canadian Association of Research Libraries Task Force on Academic Libraries and Scholarly Communication. 1997. “The Changing World of Scholarly Communication: Challenges and Choices for Canada — Final Report of the AUCC-CARL/ABRC Task Force.” Canadian Journal of Communication 22 (3): n.p.


 * Auer, Soren, Christian Bizer, Georgi Kobilarov, Jens Lehmann, Richard Cyganiak, and Zachary Ives. 2007. “DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data.” In The Semantic Web, edited by Karl Aberer, Key-Sun Choi, Natasha Noy, Dean Allemang, Kyung-Il Lee, Lyndon Nixon, Jennifer Golbeck, et al., 722–35. Busan, Korea: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52.


 * “Australasian Open Access Strategy Group.” n.d. Australasian Open Access Strategy Group. http://aoasg.org.au.


 * “Authors Alliance.” 2014. Authors Alliance. May 20. http://www.authorsalliance.org.


 * Ayris, Paul, Erica McLaren, Martin Moyle, Catherine Sharp, and Lara Speicher. 2014. “Open Access in UCL: A New Paradigm for London’s Global University in Research Support.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries 45 (4): 282–95.

B

 * Bailey, Charles. 2007. “Open Access and Libraries.” Collection Management 32 (3-4): 351–83.


 * Barnes, Jessica V., Emily L. Altimare, Patricia A. Farrell, Robert E. Brown, C. Richard Burnett III, LaDonna Gamble, and James Davis. 2009. “Creating and Sustaining Authentic Partnerships with Community in a Systemic Model.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 13 (4): 15–29.


 * Bastian, Mathieu, Sebastien Heymann, and Mathieu Jacomy. 2009. “Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks.” Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publications/Gephi%20paper.pdf.


 * Bath, Jon, Scott Schofield, and the INKE Research Group. 2014. “The Digital Book.” In The Cambridge Companion to the History of the Book, edited by Leslie Howsam, 181–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


 * Bauer, Florian, and Martin Kaltenböck. 2012. Linked Open Data: The Essentials. Vienna: edition mono/monochrom. https://www.reeep.org/sites/default/files/LOD-the-Essentials_0.pdf.


 * Belojevic, Nina. 2015. “Developing an Open, Networked Peer Review System.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6(2): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/205.


 * Bennett, W. Lance, Ed. 2006. Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


 * Bennett, W. Lance. 2004. “Communicating Global Activism: Strengths and Vulnerabilities of Networked Politics.” In Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens, and Social Movements, 123–46. London: Routledge.


 * Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2011. “Digital Media and the Personalization of Collective Action.” Information, Communication & Society 14 (6): 770–99. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369118X.2011.579141.


 * Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University. “Harvard Open Access Project.” 2015. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University. https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/research/hoap.


 * Besser, Howard. 2004. “The Past, Present, and Future of Digital Libraries.” In A Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth, 557–75. Oxford: Blackwell.


 * “Bioline International.” 2016. Bioline International. June 27. http://www.bioline.org.br.


 * Björk, Bo-Christer. 2004. “Open Access to Scientific Publications – an Analysis of the Barriers to Change?” Information Research 9 (2). n.p.


 * Bohannon, John. 2013. “Who’s Afraid of Peer Review?” Science 342: 60–5.


 * Bonaccorsi, Andrea, and Cristina Rossi. 2003. “Why Open Source Software Can Succeed.” Research Policy 32 (7): 1243–58.


 * Bonney, Rick, Caren B. Cooper, Janis Dickinson, Steve Kelling, Tina Phillips, Kenneth V. Rosenberg, and Jennifer Shirk. 2009. “Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy.” BioScience 59 (11): 977–84. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9.


 * Borgman, Christine. 2007. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


 * Bowdon, Melody A., and Russel G. Carpenter, eds. 2011. Higher Education, Emerging Technologies, and Community Partnerships Concepts, Models and Practices. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.


 * Bowen, William R., Matthew Hiebert, and Constance Crompton. 2014. “Iter Community: Prototyping an Environment for Social Knowledge Creation and Communication.” Scholarly and Research Communication. 5 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/193/360.


 * Bowman, Nick, and Bruce L. Mallory, eds. 2004. “Higher Education Collaboratives for Community Engagement and Improvement.” National Forum on Higher Education for the Public Good Conference Proceedings. Ann Arbor, MI.


 * Boyraz, Maggie, Aparna Krishnan, and Danille Catona. 2011. “Who is Retweeted in Times of Political Protest? An Analysis of Characteristics of Top Tweeters and Top Retweeted Users During the 2011 Egyptian Revolution.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 23 (2): 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.1013103.


 * Bradley, Jean-Claude, Robert J. Lancashire, Andrew SID Lang, and Anthony J. Williams. 2009. “The Spectral Game: Leveraging Open Data and Crowd-Sourcing for Education.” Journal of Cheminformatics 1 (9): 1–10.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1758-2946-1-9.


 * Brown, Susan. 2016. “Towards Best Practices in Collaborative Online Knowledge Production.” In Doing Digital Humanities: Practice, Training, Research, edited by Constance Crompton, Richard J. Lane, and Ray Siemens, 47—64. Abingdon, Oxon: Routlegde.


 * Brown, Susan. 2014. “The Changing Culture of Humanities Scholarship: Iteration, Recursion, and Versions in Scholarly Collaboration Environments.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/191/354.


 * Brown, Susan, and John Simpson. 2015. “An Entity By Any Other Name: Linked Open Data as a Basis for a Decentered, Dynamic Scholarly Publishing Ecology.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (2): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/212.


 * Bruns, Axel. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.


 * Burke, Peter. 2000. A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity Press.


 * Butin, Dan. 2010. Service-Learning in Theory and Practice: The Future of Community Engagement in Higher Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.


 * Butin, Dan. 2012a. “Rethinking the ‘Apprenticeship of Liberty’: The Case for Academic Programs in Community Engagement in Higher Education.” Journal of College and Character 13 (1): 1–8.


 * Butin, Dan. 2012b. “When Engagement is Not Enough: Building the Next Generation of the Engaged Campus.” In The Engaged Campus: Certificates, Minors, and Majors as the New Community Engagement, edited by Butin and S. Seider, 1–11. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.


 * Butin, Dan, and Scott Seider, eds. 2012. The Engaged Campus: Certificates, Minors, and Majors as the New Community Engagement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

C

 * “Canadian Association of Research Libraries.” n.d. Canadian Association of Research Libraries. http://www.carl-abrc.ca.


 * Canadian Association of Research Libraries. n.d. “Open Access.” http://www.carl-abrc.ca/advancing-research/scholarly-communication/open-access/.


 * Cantor, Nancy, and Steve D. Lavine. 2006. “Taking Public Scholarship Seriously.” The Chronicle Review 52 (40): B20.


 * Caplan, Scott E., Elizabeth M. Perse, and Janice E. Gennaria. 2007. “Computer-Mediated Technology and Social Interaction.” In Communication Technology and Social Change: Theory and Implications, edited by Carolyn A. Lin and David J. Atkin, 39–57. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


 * Carletti, Laura, Derek McAuley, Dominic Price, Gabriella Giannachi, and Steve Benford. 2013. “Digital Humanities and Crowdsourcing: An Exploration.” Museums and the Web 2013 Conference. Portland: Museums and the Web. http://mw2013.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/digital-humanities-and-crowdsourcing-an-exploration-4/.


 * Castelli, Donatella, Simon J.E. Taylor, and Franco Zoppi. 2010. “Open Knowledge on E-Infrastructure: The BELIEF Project Digital Library.” IST-Africa, 2010, 1–15.


 * Causer, Tim, and Melissa Terras. 2014. “Crowdsourcing Bentham: Beyond the Traditional Boundaries of Academic History.” International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 8 (1): 46–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2014.0119.


 * Causer, Tim, Justin Tonra, and Valerie Wallace. 2012. “Transcription Maximized; Expense Minimized? Crowdsourcing and Editing The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (formerly Literary and Linguistic Computing) 27 (2): 119–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs004.


 * “Center for Open Science.” 2014. Center for Open Science. https://cos.io.


 * “Center for the Study of the Public Domain.” n.d. Center for the Study of the Public Domain. http://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/.


 * Chan, Leslie. 2004. “Supporting and Enhancing Scholarship in the Digital Age.” Canadian Journal of Communication 29 (3): 277–300.


 * Chang, Yu-Wei. 2015. “Librarians’ Contribution to Open Access Journal Publishing in Library and Information Science From the Perspective of Authorship.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 41 (5): 660–68.


 * Childs, Merilyn, and Regine Wagner. 2015. “Open Sourced Personal, Networked Learning and Higher Education Credentials.” In Open Learning and Formal Credentialing in Higher Education, edited by Shirley Reushie, Amy Antonio, and Mike Keppell, 223–44. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.


 * Chopra, Samir, and Scott Dexter. 2009. “The Freedoms of Software and Its Ethical Uses.” Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4): 287–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9191-0.


 * Christians, Clifford. G. 2015. “Social Justice and Internet Technology.” New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604130.


 * “Coalition for Open Access Policy Institutions.” 2016. Coalition for Open Access Policy Institutions. http://sparcopen.org/people/coapi/.


 * Cohen, Daniel J. 2010. “Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Values.” May 27, 2010. https://dancohen.org/2010/05/27/open-access-publishing-and-scholarly-values/.


 * Compute Canada. 2014. Sustainable Planning for Advanced Research Computing (SPARC). Ottawa. https://www.computecanada.ca/news/compute-canada-announces-sustainable-planning-for-advanced-research-computing-sparc/.


 * “Confederation of Open Access Repositories.” n.d. Confederation of Open Access Repositories. https://www.coar-repositories.org.


 * Coonin, Bryna, and Leigh Younce. 2009. “Publishing in Open Access Journals in The Social Sciences and Humanities: Who’s Doing It and Why.” ACRL Fourteenth National Conference. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/seattle/papers/85.pdf.


 * Cooper, Amanda, and Ben Levin. 2010. “Some Canadian Contributions to Understanding Knowledge Mobilisation.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 6 (3): 351–69. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426410X524839.


 * Corrall, Sheila, Mary Anne Kennan, and Wasseem Afzal. 2013. “Bibliometrics and Research Data Management Services: Emerging Trends in Library Support for Research.” Library Trends 61 (3): 636–74.


 * Crompton, Constance, Alyssa Arbuckle, and Raymond G. Siemens, with the Devonshire Manuscript Editorial Group. 2013. “Understanding the Social Edition Through Iterative Implementation: The Case of the Devonshire MS (BL Add MS 17492).” Scholarly and Research Communication 4(3): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/118/311.


 * Crompton, Constance, Cole Mash, and Raymond G. Siemens. 2015. “Playing Well with Others: The Social Edition and Computational Collaboration.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3): n.p. http://src-online.ca/src/index.php/src/article/view/111/431.


 * Crompton, Constance, Raymond G. Siemens, and Alyssa Arbuckle, with the Devonshire Manuscript Editorial Group. 2015. “Enlisting ‘Vertues Noble & Excelent’: Behaviour, Credit, and Knowledge Organization in the Social Edition.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9 (2): n.p. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/2/000202/000202.html.

D

 * Dahlander, Linus, and Mats G. Magnusson. 2005. “Relationships between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms.” Research Policy 34 (4): 481–93.


 * Davies, Tim. 2010. “Open Data, Democracy and Public Sector Reform. A Look at Open Government Data Use from Data.gov.uk.” Open Data Impacts. http://www.opendataimpacts.net/report/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/How-is-open-government-data-being-used-in-practice.pdf.


 * Deibert, Ronald J. 2000. “International Plug N’ Play? Citizen Activism, the Internet and Global Public Policy.” International Studies Perspectives 1: 255–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.00026.


 * Deuze, Mark, Axel Bruns, and Christopher Neuberger. 2007. “Preparing for an Age of Participatory News.” Journalism Practice 1 (3): 322–38.


 * Di Noia, Tommaso, Roberto Mirizzi, Vito Claudio Ostuni, Davide Romito, and Markus Zanker. 2012. “Linked Open Data to Support Content-Based Recommender Systems.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems, 1–8. New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2362501.


 * Dumova, Tatyana. 2012. “Social Interaction Technologies and the Future of Blogging.” In Blogging in the Global Society: Cultural, Political and Geographical Aspects, edited by Dumova and Richard Fiordo, 249–74. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.


 * Dunlop, Judith M., and Graham Fawcett. 2008. “Technology-Based Approaches to Social Work and Social Justice.” Journal of Policy Practice 7 (2): 140–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588740801937961.

E

 * Edwards, Heather R., and Richard Hoefer. 2010. “Are Social Work Advocacy Groups Using Web 2.0 Effectively?” Journal of Policy Practice 9 (3): 220-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2010.489037.


 * Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 1979. The Printing Press as an Agent of Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


 * “Enabling Open Scholarship.” n.d. Enabling Open Scholarship. http://www.eua.be/activities-services/news/newsitem/09-10-15/Enabling_Open_Scholarship_EOS.aspx.


 * Erickson, John, Carl Lagoze, Sandy Payette, Herbert Van de Sompel, and Simeon Warner. 2004. “Rethinking Scholarly Communication: Building the System That Scholars Deserve.” D-Lib Magazine 10 (9): n.p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/september2004-vandesompel.


 * Estellés-Arolas, Enrique, and Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara. 2012. “Towards an Integrated Crowdsourcing Definition.” Journal of Information Science 38 (2): 189–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551512437638.


 * “European University Association.” n.d. European University Association. http://www.eua.be.


 * Eve, Martin Paul. 2015. “Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Communication in Non-Scientific Disciplines.” Online Information Review 39 (5): 717–32.

F

 * Farrington, John, and Conor Farrington. 2005. “Rural Accessibility, Social Inclusion and Justice: Towards Conceptualisation.” Journal of Transport Geography 13 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002.


 * Fear, Kathleen. 2011. “‘You Made It, You Take Care of It’: Data Management as Personal Information Management.” International Journal of Digital Curation 6 (2): 53–77. http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/183.


 * Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2018a. “Issues.” Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences / Fédération des sciences humaines. http://www.ideas-idees.ca/issues/open-access-aspp.


 * Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2018b. “Our Members.” Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences / Fédération des sciences humaines.n.d. “Our Members.” www.ideas-idees.ca/about/members.
 * Feller, Joseph, and Brian Fitzgerald. 2002. Understanding Open Source Software Development. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co.


 * Filipacchi, Amanda. 2013. “Wikipedia’s Sexism Toward Female Novelists.” New York Times, April 24. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/opinion/sunday/wikipedias-sexism-toward-female-novelists.html.


 * “FinnOA.” n.d. FinnOA. http://www.finnoa.fi.


 * Fitzgerald, Brian. 2006. “The Transformation of Open Source Software.” MIS Quarterly 30 (3): 587–98.


 * Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. 2007. “CommentPress: New (Social) Structures for New (Networked) Texts.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 10 (3): n.p. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0010.305.


 * Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. 2011. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. New York: New York University Press.


 * Fjällbrant, Nancy. 1997. “Scholarly Communication—Historical Development and New Possibilities.” In Proceedings of the IATUL Conference. Indiana: Purdue University Library. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/1997/papers/5/.


 * “Force11.” 2016. Force11. https://www.force11.org.


 * “Foundation for Open Access Statistics.” 2013. Foundation for Open Access Statistics. http://www.foastat.org.


 * Franklin, Michael, Donald Kossman, Tim Kraska, Sukrit Ramesh, and Reynold Xin. 2011. “CrowdDB: Answering Queries with Crowdsourcing.” In Proceedings of the 2011 Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 61–72. New York: Association of Computing Machinery.


 * “Free Knowledge Institute.” 2015. http://freeknowledge.eu/about.


 * Fund, Sven. 2015. “Will Open Access Change the Game?” Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 39 (2): 206–9.

G

 * Gahran, Amy. 2012. “SeeClickFix: Crowdsourced Local Problem Reporting as Community News.” Knight Digital Media Center. September 19, 2012. http://www.knightdigitalmediacenter.org/blogs/agahran/2012/09/seeclickfix-crowdsourced-local-problem-reporting-community-news.html.


 * Gaines, Annie. 2015. “From Concerned to Cautiously Optimistic: Assessing Faculty Perception and Knowledge of Open Access in a Campus-Wide Study.” Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication 3 (1): 1–40.


 * Gainforth, Heather L., Amy E. Latimer-Cheung, Spencer Moore, Peter Athanasopoulos, and Kathleen A. Martin Ginis. 2014. “Using Network Analysis to Understand Knowledge Mobilization in a Community-Based Organization.” International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 22 (3): 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9430-6.


 * Gallo, Travis, and Damon Waitt. 2011. “Creating a Successful Citizen Science Model to Detect and Report Invasive Species.” BioScience 61 (6): 459–65. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.6.8.


 * Gargouri, Yassine, Chawki Hajjem, Vincent Larivière, Yves Gringas, Les Carr, Tim Brody, and Stevan Harnad. 2010. “Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Impact for Higher Quality Research.” PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636.


 * Geiger, Christian P., and Jorn Von Lucke. 2012. “Open Government and (Linked) (Open) (Government) (Data).” eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 4 (2): 265–78.


 * Ghobadi, Shahla, and Stewart Clegg. 2015. “‘These Days Will Never Be Forgotten …’: A Critical Mass Approach to Online Activism.” Information and Organization 25 (1): 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.12.002.


 * Given, Lisa, Stan Ruecker, Heather Simpson, Bess Sadler, and Andrea Ruskin. 2007. “Inclusive Interface Design for Seniors: Exploring the Health Information-Seeking Context.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (11): 1610–17.


 * Godfrey, Michael W., and Qiang Tu. 2000. “Evolution in Open Source Software: A Case Study.” In ICSM ‘00 Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM ‘00). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.


 * Goldkind, Lauri. 2014. “E-Advocacy in Human Services: The Impact of Organizational Conditions and Characteristics on Electronic Advocacy Activities among Nonprofits.” Journal of Policy Practice 13 (4): 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2014.929073.


 * Gorlitz, Olaf, and Steffen Staab. 2011. “Federated Data Management and Query Optimization for Linked Open Data.” In New Directions in Web Data Management 1, edited by A. Vakali and L.C. Jain, 109–37. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17551-0_5.


 * Gosh, Aprila, Kale Satyen, and Preston McAfee. 2011. “Who Will Moderate the Moderators? Crowdsourcing Abuse Detection in User-Generated Content.” In EC’11 Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 167–76.


 * Government of Canada. 2015. Digital Canada 150. http://www.digitaleconomy.gc.ca/eic/site/028.nsf/eng/home.


 * Government of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. 2015. “Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications.” Science and Technology for Canadians. http://www.science.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=F6765465-1.


 * Graham, Ian D., Jacqueline Tetroe, and KT Theories Research Group. 2007. “Some Theoretical Underpinnings of Knowledge Translation.” Academic Emergency Medicine 14 (11): 936–41. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02369.x.


 * Gray, Jonathan. 2015. “Five Ways Open Data Can Boost Democracy around the World.” The Guardian. February 20, 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2015/feb/20/open-data-day-fairer-taxes.


 * Grumbach, Elizabeth, and Laura Mandell. 2014. “Meeting Scholars Where They Are: The Advanced Research Consortium (ARC) and a Social Humanities Infrastructure.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4). http://www.src-online.ca/src/index.php/src/article/view/189/362.


 * Gurstein, Michael B. 2011. “Open Data: Empowering the Empowered or Effective Data Use for Everyone?” First Monday 16 (2). https://gurstein.wordpress.com/2010/09/02/open-data-empowering-the-empowered-or-effective-data-use-for-everyone/.

H

 * Hall, Peter V. ed. 2011. Community-University Research Partnerships: Reflections on the Canadian Social Economy Experience. Victoria: University of Victoria.


 * Hamlyn, Hilda. 1946. “Eighteenth-Century Circulating Libraries in England.” The Library 5 (3-4): 197–222.


 * Hampson, Crystal. 2014. “The Adoption of Open Access Funds Among Canadian Academic Research Libraries, 2008-2012.” The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research 9 (2): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v9i2.3115.


 * Harris, Michael H. 1999. History of Libraries in the Western World. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press.


 * Hars, Alexander, and Shaosong Ou. 2001. “Working for Free? – Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects.” In Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2001). Washington, DC: IEEE.


 * Hart, A., and D. Wolff. 2006. “Developing Communities of Practice Through Community-University Partnerships.” Planning Practice and Research 21 (1): 121–38.


 * Hart, A., and Simon Northmore. 2008. “Auditing and Evaluating University-Community Engagement. Lessons from a UK Case Study.” Higher Education Quarterly 65 (1): 34–58.


 * Harth, Andreas, Katja Hose, and Ralf Schenkel. 2014. Linked Data Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.


 * Hartung, Carl, Adam Lerer, Yaw Anokwa, Clint Tseng, Waylon Brunette, and Gaetano Borriello. 2010. “Open Data Kit: Tools to Build Information Services for Developing Regions.” In ICDT ’10: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2369236.


 * Hausenblas, M., and M. Karnstedt. 2010. “Understanding Linked Open Data as a Web-Scale Database.” In 2010 Second International Conference on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, and Data Applications, 56–61. Menuires: IEEE Computer Society. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5477146.


 * Häyhtiö, Tapio, and Jarmo Rinne. 2007. “Hard Rock Hallelujah! Empowering Reflexive Political Action on the Internet.” Journal for Cultural Research 11 (4): 337–58. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14797580802038702.


 * “Harvard Open Access Project.” 2015. Harvard Open Access Project. https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/research/hoap.


 * Heath, Malcolm, Michael Jubb, and David Robey. 2008. “E-Publication and Open Access in the Arts and Humanities in the UK.” Ariadne.


 * Hedges, Mark, Adil Hasan, and Tobias Blanke. 2007. “Management and Preservation of Research Data with iRODS.” In Proceedings of the ACM First Workshop on CyberInfrastructure: Information Management in eScience, 17–22. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1317358.


 * Henty, Margaret, Belinda Weaver, Simon Bradbury, and Simon Porter. 2008. “Investigating Data Management Practices in Australian Universities.” APSR. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/14549/1/14549.pdf.


 * Hiebert, Matthew, William R. Bowen, and Raymond Siemens. 2015. “Implementing a Social Knowledge Creation Environment.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6(3): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/223/436.


 * Holland, B., and J. Ramaley. 2008. “Creating a Supportive Environment for Community-University Engagement: Conceptual Frameworks” In HERDSA 2008 Conference Proceedings. http://www.herdsa.org.au/system/files/Holland%20%26%20Ramaley.pdf


 * Holley, Rose. 2010. “Crowdsourcing: How and Why Should Libraries Do It?” D-Lib Magazine 16 (3, 4): n.p. http://www.dlib.org/10.1045/march2010–dlib/march10/holley/03holley.html.


 * Howard, Philip N., Sheetal D. Agarwal, and Muzammil M. Hussain. 2011. “When Do States Disconnect Their Digital Networks? Regime Responses to the Political Uses of Social Media.” The Communication Review 14 (3): 216–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597254.


 * Hoy, A., and M. Johnson, eds. 2013. Deepening Community Engagement in Higher Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. “IFLA Open Access Taskforce.” 2013. IFLA Open Access Taskforce.

I

 * International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. IFLA Open Access Taskforce. October 11, 2011. https://www.ifla.org/DE/news/ifla-open-access.net/startseite/.-taskforce-established.


 * “International Community for Open Research and Education.” 2016. ICORE. International Community for Open Research and Education. http://www.icore-online.org.


 * International Council for Science. 2015. “Open Data in a Big Data World.” Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU), International Social Science Council (ISSC), The World Academy of Sciences (TWAS), InterAcademy Partnership (IAP). https://www.icsu.org/science-international/accordcms/2017/04/open-data-in-a-big-data-world-long.pdf..

J

 * Jackson, Michael, Mario Antonioletti, Bartosz Dobrzelecki, Neil Chue Hong. 2011. “Distributed Data Management with OGSA-DAI.” In Grid and Cloud Database Management, 63-86.


 * Jackson, Mike, Mario Antonioletti, Alastair Hume, Tobias Blanke, Gabriel Bodard, Mark Hedges, and Shrija Rajbhandari. 2009. “Building Bridges Between Islands of Data – an Investigation into Distributed Data Management in the Humanities.” In 2009 Fifth IEEE International Conference on E-Science, 33–39.


 * Jain, Prateek, Pascal Hitzler, Amit P. Seth, Kunal Verma, and Peter Z. Yeh. 2010. “Ontology Alignment for Linked Open Data.” In The Semantic Web - ISCW 2010, edited by P.F. Patel-Schneider et al., 402–17. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-17746-0_26.


 * Janssen, Katleen. 2012. “Open Government Data and the Right to Information: Opportunities and Obstacles.” The Journal of Community Informatics 8 (2): n.p. http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/952.


 * Janssen, Marijn, Yannis Charalabidis, and Anneke Zuiderwijk. 2012. “Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government.” Information Systems Management 29 (4): 258–68. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740.


 * Jenkins, Henry, and Mark Deuze. 2008. “Convergent Culture.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14 (1): 5–12. http://con.sagepub.com/content/14/1/5.full.pdf+html.


 * Jensen, Klaus Bruhn, and Rasmus Helles. 2011. “The Internet as a Cultural Forum: Implications for Research.” New Media & Society 13 (4): 517–33.


 * Johns, Adrian. 1998. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.


 * Johnson, Jeffrey Alan. 2014. “From Open Data to Information Justice.” Ethics and Information Technology 16 (4): 263–74. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-014-9351-8.


 * Johnston, Lisa, Meghan Lafferty, and Beth Petsan. 2012. “Training Researchers on Data Management: A Scalable, Cross-Disciplinary Approach.” Journal of eScience Librarianship 1 (2): 79–87. http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/vol1/iss2/2/.


 * Jones, Sarah, Alexander Ball, Çuna Ekmekcioglu. 2008. “The Data Audit Framework: A First Step in the Data Management Challenge.” International Journal of Digital Curation 3(2): 112-120. http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/91.


 * Jones, Steven E. 2014. “Publications.” In The Emergence of the Digital Humanities, 147–77. New York: Routledge.


 * Jordan, Mary Wilkins. 2015. “Public Library History on the Lewis and Clark Trail.” Public Library Quarterly 34 (2): 162–77.


 * Jordan, Rebecca C., Heidi L. Ballard, and Tina B. Phillips. 2012. “Key Issues and New Approaches for Evaluating Citizen-Science Learning Outcomes.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 (6): 307–9. https://doi.org/10.1890/110280.

K

 * Kalampokis, Evangelos, Efthimios Tambouris, and Konstantinos Tarabanis. 2011. “Open Government Data: A Stage Model.” In 10th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2011, 235–46. Delft, Netherlands: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_20.


 * Keen, Peter, and Margaret Tan. 2009. “Knowledge Fusion: A Framework for Extending the Rigor and Relevance of Knowledge Management.” In Knowledge Management, Organizational Memory and Transfer Behavior: Global Approaches and Advancements, edited by George Kelley, 358-74. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference – Imprint of IGI Publishing. https://www.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-60566-140-7chapter/knowledge-fusion-framework-extending-rigor/28677.


 * Kelly, Thomas. 1966. Early Public Libraries: A History of Public Libraries in Great Britain before 1850. London: Library Association.


 * Kelly, Thomas. 1973. History of Public Libraries in Great Britain, 1845-1965. London: Library Association.


 * Kelty, Christopher M. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham: Duke University Press.


 * Kingsley, Danny. 2013. “Build It and They Will Come? Support for Open Access in Australia.” Scholarly and Research Communication 4 (1): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/viewFile/39/121.


 * Kitchin, Rob, Sandra Collins, and Dermot Frost. 2015. “Funding Models for Open Access Digital Data Repositories.” Online Information Review 39 (5): 664–81.


 * Kline, Jesse. 2013. “Why Canada has Third World Access to the Internet.” National Post, September 24, 2013. http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/jesse-kline-why-canada-has-third-world-access-to-the-internet.


 * “Knowledge Exchange.” n.d. KE: Knowledge Exchange. http://www.knowledge-exchange.info.


 * Koehn, Phillip, Hieu Hoang, Alexandra Birch, Chris Callison-Burch, Marcello Federico, Nicola Bertoldi, Brooke Cowan et al. 2007. “Moses: Open Source Toolkit for Statistical Machine Translation.” In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting for the ACL on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions, 177–80.


 * Kogut, Bruce, and Anca Metiu. 2001. “Open Source Software Development and Distributed Innovation.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17 (2): 248–64.


 * Kondratova, Irina, and Ilia Goldfarb. 2004. “Virtual Communities of Practice: Design for Collaboration and Knowledge Creation.” In Proceedings of the European Conference on Products and Processes Modelling.


 * Krier, Laura, and Carly A. Strasser. 2014. Data Management for Libraries: A Lita Guide. Chicago: ALA TechSource.

L

 * Laakso, Mikael and Bo-Christer Björk. 2012. “Anatomy of Open Access Publishing: a Study of Longitudinal Development and Internal Structure.” BMC Medicine.


 * Lakhani, Karim R., and Eric Von Hippel. 2003. “How Open Source Software Works: ‘free’ User-to-User Assistance.” Research Policy 32 (6): 923–43.


 * Lam, Shyong K., Anuradha Uduwage, Zhenhua Dong, Shilad Sen, David R. Musicant, Loren Terveen, and John Riedl. 2011. “WP: Clubhouse? An Exploration of Wikipedia’s Gender Imbalance.” WikiSym 2011. http://files.grouplens.org/papers/wp-gender-wikisym2011.pdf.


 * Lampe, Cliff, Robert LaRose, Charles Steinfield, and Kurt DeMaagd. 2011. “Inherent Barriers to the Use of Social Media for Public Policy Informatics.” The Innovation Journal 16 (1): 1–17.


 * Landry, Réjean, Nabil Amara, and Moktar Lamari. 2001. “Utilization of Social Science Research Knowledge in Canada.” Research Policy 30 (2): 333–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00081-0.


 * Lane, Richard. 2014. “Faith-Based Electronic Publishing and Learning Environments as Model for New Scholarly Publishing Applications.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/188.


 * Langman, Lauren. 2005. “From Virtual Public Spheres to Global Justice: A Critical Theory of Internetworked Social Movements.” Sociology Theory 23 (1): 42–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00242.x.


 * Lavis, John N. 2006. “Research, Public Policymaking, and Knowledge-Translation Processes: Canadian Efforts to Build Bridges.” The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 26 (1): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.49.


 * Leadership Council for Digital Infrastructure. 2014. “‘Think Piece’ on a DI Roadmap.” http://digitalleadership.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/DI-Roadmap-Think-Piece-Jan-2014.pdf.


 * Lerner, Josh, and Jean Tirole. 2001. “The Open Source Movement: Key Research Questions.” European Economic Review 45 (4-6): 819–26.


 * Lerner, Josh, and Jean Tirole. 2002. “Some Simple Economics of Open Source.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 50 (2): 197–234.


 * Lewis, M.J. 2010. “Libraries and the Management of Research Data.” In Envisioning Future Academic Library Services, edited by S. McKnight. London: Facet Publishing.


 * Lewis, Vivian, Lisa Spiro, Xuemao Wang, and Jon E. Cawthorne. 2015. “Building Expertise to Support Digital Scholarship.” Council on Library and Information Resources. https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub168/pub168.


 * Lin, Carolyn A., and David J. Atkin. 2007. Communication Technology and Social Change: Theory and Implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


 * “Lithuanian Research Library Consortium.” 2016. Lithuanian Research Library Consortium. Last modified June 15, 2018. http://www.lmba.lt/en.


 * Liu, Alan. 2007. “Imagining the New Media Encounter.” In A Companion to Digital Literary Studies, edited by Raymond Siemens and Susan Schreibman, 3-25. Oxford: Blackwell.


 * Losh, Elisabeth. 2012. “Hacktivism and the Humanities: Programming Protest in the Era of the Digital University.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew Gold, 161–86. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/32.


 * Lorimer, Rowland. 2013. “Libraries, Scholars, and Publishers in Digital Journal and Monograph Publishing.” Scholarly and Research Communication 4 (1): n.p. http://srconline.ca/index.php/src/article/viewFile/43/117.


 * Lorimer, Rowland. 2014. “A Good Idea, a Difficult Reality: Toward a Publisher/Library Open Access Partnership.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/180.


 * Lowe, Megan. 2014. “In Defense of Open Access: Or, Why I Stopped Worrying and Started an OA Journal.” Codex 2 (4): 1–11.

M

 * Mako Hill, Benjamin, and Aaron Shaw. 2013. “The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation.” PLOS One. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065782.


 * Manzo, Christina, Geoff Kaufman, Sukdith Punjashitkul, and Mary Flanagan. 2015. “‘By the People, For the People’: Assessing the Value of Crowdsourced, User-Generated Metadata.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9 (1): n.p. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/1/000204/000204.html.


 * “Max Planck Society.” "Berlin Declaration." 2016. Open Access at the Max Planck Society. https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration.


 * Maxwell, John. 2014. “Publishing Education in the 21st Century and the Role of the University.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 17 (2): n.p. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0017.205?view=text;rgn=main.


 * Maxwell, John. 2015. “Beyond Open Access to Open Content.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/202.


 * Mayer, Amy. 2010. “Phenology and Citizen Science.” BioScience 60 (3): 172–75. doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.3.


 * McDonald, Kevin. 2015. “From Indymedia to Anonymous: Rethinking Action and Identity in Digital Cultures.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (8): 968–82. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1039561.


 * McGregor, Heidi, and Kevin Guthrie. 2015. “Delivering Impact of Scholarly Information: Is Access Enough?” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (3): n.p. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0018.302?view=text;rgn=main.


 * McKinley, Donelle. 2012. “Practical Management Strategies for Crowdsourcing in Libraries, Archives and Museums.” Report for Victoria University of Wellington: n.p. http://nonprofitcrowd.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/McKinley-2012–Crowdsourcing-management-strategies.pdf.


 * McLuhan, Marshall. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.


 * McNall, Miles, Celeste Sturdevant Reed, Robert Brown, and Angela Allen. 2009. “Brokering Community-University Engagement.” Innovative Higher Education 33 (5): 317–31.


 * Meadows, Alice. 2015. “Beyond Open: Expanding Access to Scholarly Content.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (3): n.p. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0018.301?view=text;rgn=main.


 * “Mediterranean Open Access Network.” n.d. Mediterranean Open Access Network. http://www.medoanet.eu.


 * Merry, Melissa K. 2011. “Interest Group Activism on the Web: The Case of Environmental Organization.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 8 (1): 110–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI335.


 * Merry, Melissa K. 2013. “Tweeting for a Cause: Microblogging and Environmental Advocacy.” Policy and Internet 5 (3): 304–27. https://doi.org:10.1002/1944-2866.POI335.


 * Mihailidis, Paul. 2014. “The Civic-Social Media Disconnect: Exploring Perceptions of Social Media for Engagement in the Daily Life of College Students.” Information, Communication & Society 17 (9): 1059–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.877054.


 * Milakovich, Michael E. 2011. Digital Governance: New Technologies for Improving Public Service and Participation. New York: Routledge.


 * Milberry, Kate. 2006. “Reconstructing the Internet: How Social Justice Activists Contest Technical Design in Cyberspace.” Media Culture Journal 9 (1). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0603/10-milberry.php.


 * Mockus, Audris, Roy T. Fielding, and James D. Herbsleb. 2002. “Two Case Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla.” ACM Transactions of Software Engineering and Methodology 11 (3): 309–46.


 * Molloy, Jennifer. 2011. “The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science.” PLOS Biology 9 (12): 1–4. http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195.


 * Mortensen, Mette. 2015. “Connective Witnessing: Re-Configuring the Relationship Between the Individual and the Collective.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (11): 1393–1406.


 * Murray-Rust, Peter. 2008. “Open Data in Science.” Serial Reviews 34 (1): 52–64. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00987913.2008.10765152.

N

 * Newman, Greg, Andrea Wiggins, Alycia Crall, Eric Graham, Sarah Newman, and Kevin Crowston. 2012. “The Future of Citizen Science: Emerging Technologies and Shifting Paradigms.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 (6): 298–304.

O

 * Ober, Josiah, Walter Scheidel, Brent D. Shaw, and Donna Sanclemente. 2007. “Toward Open Access in Ancient Studies: The Princeton-Stanford Working Papers in Classic.” Hesperia 76 (1): 229–42.


 * Oberhauser, Karen, and Gretchen LeBuhn. 2012. “Insects and Plants: Engaging Undergraduates in Authentic Research through Citizen Science.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 (6): 318–20. doi:10.1890/110274.


 * O’Donnell, Daniel, Heather Hobma, Sandra Cowan, Gillian Ayers, Jessica Bay, Marinus Swanepoel, Wendy Merkley, Kelaine Devine, Emma Dering, Inge Genee. 2015. “Aligning Open Access Publication with the Research and Teaching Missions of the Public University: The Case of the Lethbridge Journal Incubator (If 'if's and 'and's were pots and pans).” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (3): n.p. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0018.309.


 * O’Meara, K., L.R. Sandmann, J. Saltmarsh, and D. Giles. 2011. “Studying the Professional Lives and Work of Faculty Involved in Community Engagement.” Innovative Higher Education 36 (2): 83–96.


 * Oostveen, Anne-Marie. 2010. “Citizens and Activists: Analysing the Reasons, Impact, and Benefits of Civic Emails Directed at a Grassroots Campaign.” Information, Communication & Society 13 (6): 793–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180903277637.


 * “Open Access India.” n.d. http://openaccessindia.org.


 * “Open Access Network.” 2018. Open Access Network. http://openaccessnetwork.org.


 * “Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.” 2018. Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association. http://oaspa.org.


 * “Open Access Working Group.” n.d. Open Access Working Group. http://access.okfn.org.


 * “Open Book Alliance.” 2009. Open Book Alliance. http://openbookalliance.org.


 * “Open Humanities Alliance.” n.d. Open Humanities Alliance. http://openhumanitiesalliance.org.


 * “Open Knowledge International.” n.d. Open Knowledge International. https://okfn.org.


 * “Open Scholarship Initiative.” 2017. Open Scholarship Initiative. http://osinitiative.org.


 * “OpenAIRE.” n.d. OpenAIRE. February 5, 2016. https://www.openaire.eu.


 * Orlikowski, Wanda J. 2002. “Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing.” Organization Science 13 (3): 249–73. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776.


 * Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2015. “Making Open Science a Reality.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 25.

P

 * Paliwala, Abdul. 2007. “Free Culture, Global Commons and Social Justice in Information Technology Diffusion.” Law, Social Justice, and Global Development Journal 1. n.p.


 * Pasque, Penny A., Ryan E. Smerek, Brighid Dwyer, Nick Bowman, and Bruce L. Mallory, eds. 2005. Higher Education Collaboratives for Community Engagement and Improvement. National Forum on Higher Education for the Public Good. Ann Arbor, MI. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED515231.pdf.


 * Peekhaus, Wilhelm, and Nicholas Proferes. 2015. “How Library and Information Science Faculty Perceive and Engage with Open Access.” Journal of Information Science 41 (5): 640–61.


 * Phillips, Tina, Janis Dickinson, Caren B. Cooper, and Rick Bonney. 2007. “Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems.” Ecology and Society 12 (2): 11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art11/.


 * Phipps, David. 2012. “A Report Detailing the Development of a University-Based Knowledge Mobilization Unit that Enhances Research Outreach and Engagement.” Scholarly and Research Communication 2 (2): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/31.


 * Pickerill, Jenny. 2009. “Symbolic Production, Representation, and Contested Identities: Anti-War Activism Online.” Information, Communication & Society 12 (7): 969–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802524469.


 * Pinfield, Stephen. 2015. “Making Open Access Work.” Online Information Review 39 (5): 604–36.


 * Piwowar, Heather A., and Todd J. Vision. 2013. “Data Reuse and the Open Data Citation Advantage.” PeerJ 1:e175. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.175.


 * Powell, Daniel James, Raymond G. Siemens, and the INKE Research Group. 2014. “Building Alternative Scholarly Publishing Capacity: The Renaissance Knowledge Network (ReKN) as Digital Production Hub.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/183.


 * Powell, Daniel, Raymond G. Siemens, and William R. Bowen, with Matthew Hiebert and Lindsey Seatter. 2015. “Transformation through Integration: The Renaissance Knowledge Network (ReKN) and a Next Wave of Scholarly Publication.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (2): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/199.


 * Prelinger, Rick. 2007. “Archives and Access in the 21st Century.” Cinema Journal. 46 (3): 114–8.


 * Presner, Todd, David Shepard, and Yoh Kawano. 2014. HyperCities: Thick Mapping in Digital Humanities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3mh5t455.


 * Prestopnik, Nathan, and Kevin Crowston. 2011. "Gaming for (Citizen) Science: Exploring Motivation and Data Quality in the Context of Crowdsourced Science through the Design and Evaluation of a Social-Computational System." e-Science Workshops (eScienceW), 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference, 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1109/eScienceW.2011.14.


 * “Public Knowledge Project.” 2014. Public Knowledge Project. https://pkp.sfu.ca.


 * Purdam, Kingsley. 2014. “Citizen Social Science and Citizen Data? Methodological and Ethical Challenges for Social Research.” Current Sociology 62 (3): 374–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114527997.

R

 * Rath, Prabhash Narayana. 2015. “Study of Open Access Publishing in Social Sciences and its Implications for Libraries.” DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 35 (3): 117–83.


 * Raymond, Eric S. 2001. The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. Beijing: O'Reilly.


 * RECODE Project Consortium. 2014. “Policy Recommendations for Open Access to Research Data.” https://zenodo.org/record/50863/files/recode_guideline_en_web_version_full_FINAL.pdf


 * Research Data Canada. 2013. “Research Data Canada Response to Capitalizing on Big Data: Towards a Policy Framework for Advancing Digital Scholarship in Canada.” http://www.rdc-drc.ca/wp-content/uploads/Research-Data-Canada-Response-to-the-Tri-Council-Consultation-on-Digital-Scholarship.pdf.


 * Ridge, Mia. 2013. “From Tagging to Theorizing: Deepening Engagement with Cultural Heritage through Crowdsourcing.” Curator 56 (4): 435–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cura.12046.


 * Ridley, Michael, Clare Appavoo, and Sabina Pagotto. 2014. “Seeing the Forest and the Trees: The Integrated Digital Scholarship Ecosystem (IDSE) Project of the Canadian Research Knowledge Network (CRKN).” http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2015/Ridley_Appavoo_Pagotto.pdf.


 * “Right to Research Coalition.” 2010. Right to Research Coalition. http://www.righttoresearch.org.


 * Ritzer, George, and Nathan Jurgenson. 2010. “Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital ‘Prosumer.’” Journal of Consumer Culture 10 (1): 13–36.


 * Roberts, Jeffrey A., Il-Horn Hann, and Sandra A. Slaughter. 2006. “Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects.” Management Science 52 (7): 984–9.


 * Rockwell, Geoffrey. 2012. “Crowdsourcing the Humanities: Social Research and Collaboration.” In Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities, edited by Marilyn Deegan and Willard McCarty, 135–55. Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing.


 * Rodriguez, Julia. 2014. “Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing: A Glance at Generational Differences.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 40 (6): 604–10.


 * Romary, Laurent. 2012. “Data Management in the Humanities.” ERCIM News 89. April 3, 2012.


 * Rosen, Lawrence. 2004. Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.


 * Rosenzweig, Roy. 2006. “Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past.” The Journal of American History 93 (1): 117–46.


 * Ross, Stephen, Alex Christie, and Jentery Sayers. 2014. “Expert/Crowd-Sourcing for the Linked Modernisms Project.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/src/index.php/src/article/view/186/370.


 * Rotman, Dana, Jenny Preece, Jen Hammock, Kezee Procita, Derek Hansen, Cynthia Parr, Darcy Lewis, and David Jacobs. 2012. “Dynamic Changes in Motivation in Collaborative Citizen-Science Projects.” In CSCW ’12 Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 217–226. New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145238.


 * Ruecker, Stan. 2015. “A Brief Taxonomy of Prototypes for the Digital Humanities.” Scholarly Research and Communication. 6 (2). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/222.


 * Ruecker, Stan, Lisa Given, Heather Simpson, Bess Sadler, and Andrea Ruskin. 2007. “Design of a Rich-Prospect Browsing Interface for Seniors: A Qualitative Study of Image Similarity Clustering.” Visible Language 41 (1): 4–22.


 * Ruecker, Stan, Milena Radzikowska, and Stéfan Sinclair. 2011. Visual Interface Design for Digital Cultural Heritage: A Guide to Rich Prospect Browsing. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

S

 * Sakr, Sherif, and Eric Pardede. 2012. Graph Data Management: Techniques and Applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.


 * Saklofske, Jon. 2014. “Exploding, Centralizing and Reimagining: Critical Scholarship Refracted Through the NewRadial Prototype.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (2): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/151.


 * Saklofske, Jon. 2016. “Digital Theoria, Poiesis and Praxis: Activating Humanities Research and Communication through Open Social Scholarship Platform Design.” Scholarly and Research Communication 7 (2): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/252/495.


 * Saklofske, Jon, and Jake Bruce, with the INKE Research Group. 2013. “Beyond Browsing and Reading: The Open Work of Digital Scholarly Editions.” Scholarly and Research Communication 4 (3): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/119.


 * San Martin, Patricia Silvana, Paolo Caroline Bongiovani, Ana Casali, and Claudia Deco. 2015. “Study on Perspectives Regarding Deposit on Open Access Repositories in Context of Public Universities in the Central-Eastern Region of Argentina.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (1): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/145.


 * Sandoval-Almazan, Rodrigo, and J. Ramon Gil-Garcia. 2014. “Towards Cyberactivism 2.0? Understanding the Use of Social Media and Other Information Technologies for Political Activism and Social Movements.” Government Information Quarterly 31 (3): 365–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.016.


 * San Martin, Patricia Silvana, Paolo Caroline Bongiovani, Ana Casali, and Claudia Deco. 2015. “Study on Perspectives Regarding Deposit on Open Access Repositories in Context of Public Universities in the Central-Eastern Region of Argentina.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (1):n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/145.


 * Schloss, Patrick D., Sarah L. Westcott, Thomas Ryabin, Justine R. Hall, Martin Hartmann, Emily B. Hollister, Ryan A. Lesniewski et al. 2009 “Introducing mothur: Open Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75 (23): 7537–41.


 * Schmidt, Albercht, Florian Waas, Martin Kersten, Michael J. Cares, Ioana Manolescu, and Ralph Busse. 2002. “XMark: A Benchmark for XML Data Management.” In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 974–85.


 * Schreibman, Susan, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth, eds. 2004. A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell.


 * Shadbolt, Nigel, Kieron O’Hara, Tim Berners-Lee, Nicholas Gibbins, Hugh Glaser, Wendy Hall, and M.C. Schraefel. 2012. “Linked Open Government Data: Lessons from Data.gov.uk.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 27 (3): 16–24. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/340564/.


 * Shearer, Kathleen, and Bill Birdsall. 2002. “The Transition of Scholarly Communications in Canada.” 1–13. http://www.moyak.com/papers/scholarly-communications-canada.pdf.


 * Siemens, Lynne. 2009. “It’s a Team if You Use ‘Reply All’: An Exploration of Research Teams in Digital Humanities Environments.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 24(2): 225–33.


 * Siemens, Lynne. 2012a. “Firing on All Cylinders: Progress and Transition in INKE’s Year 2.” Scholarly and Research Communication 3(4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/72.


 * Siemens, Lynne. 2012b “Understanding Long-Term Collaboration: Reflections on Year 1 and Before.” Scholarly and Research Communication 3(1): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/48/192.


 * Siemens, Lynne. 2013. “Responding to Change and Transition in INKE’s Year 3.” Scholarly and Research Communication 4(3): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/115/256.


 * Siemens, Lynne. 2014. “Research Collaboration as ‘Layers of Engagement’: INKE in Year Four.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5(4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/src/index.php/src/article/view/181/383.


 * Siemens, Lynne. 2016. “‘Faster Alone, Further Together’: Reflections on INKE’s Year Six.” Scholarly and Research Communication 7(2): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/250.


 * Siemens, Lynne, Raymond G. Siemens, Richard Cunningham, Teresa Dobson, Alan Galey, Stan Ruecker, and Claire Warwick. 2012. “INKE Administrative Structure: Omnibus Document.” Scholarly and Research Communication 3(1): n.p. https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/INKE/article/view/546/245.


 * Siemens, Raymond G. 2002. “Scholarly Publishing at its Source, and at Present.” In The Credibility of Electronic Publishing: A Report to the Humanities and Social Sciences Federation of Canada, compiled by Raymond G. Siemens, Michael Best, Elizabeth Grove-White, Alan Burk, James Kerr, Andy Pope, Jean-Claude Guédon, Geoffrey Rockwell, and Lynne Siemens. Text Technology 11 (1): 1–128. https://web.archive.org/web/20151012065051/https://web.viu.ca/hssfc/Final/Overview.htm.


 * Siemens, Raymond G., Claire Warwick, Richard Cunningham, Teresa Dobson, Alan Galey, Stan Ruecker, Susan Schreibman, and the INKE Research Group. 2009. “Codex Ultor: Toward a Conceptual and Theoretical Foundation for New Research on Books and Knowledge Environments.” Digital Studies / Le Champ Numerique 1 (2): n.p. http://www.digitalstudies.org/ojs/index.php/digital_studies/article/view/177/220.


 * Siemens, Raymond G., and David Moorman, eds. 2006. Mind Technologies: Humanities Computing and the Canadian Academic Community. Calgary: U Calgary P.


 * Siemens, Raymond G., and Kenneth Price, eds. 2013. Literary Studies in the Digital Age. New York: Modern Language Associations.


 * Siemens, Raymond G., Teresa Dobson, Stan Ruecker, Richard Cunningham, Alan Galey, Claire Warwick, and Lynne Siemens. 2011. “HCI-Book? Perspectives on E-Book Research, 2006-2008 (Foundational to Implementing New Knowledge Environments).” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of Canada / Cahiers de la Société bibliographique du Canada 49 (1). http://web.uvic.ca/~siemens/pub/2011-HCI-Book.pdf.


 * Silka, Linda, and Paulette Renault-Caragianes. 2006. “Community-University Research Partnerships: Devising a Model for Ethical Engagement.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 11 (2): 171–83.


 * Silka, Linda, G. Dean Cleghorn, Milago Grullon, and Trinidad Tellez. 2008. “Creating Community-Based Participatory Research in a Diverse Community: A Case Study.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 3 (2): 5–16.


 * Silka, Linda, and Robin Toof. 2011. “International Perspectives on Community-University Partnerships.” Metropolitan Universities Journal: An International Forum 22 (2): 3–162.


 * Silvertown, Jonathan. 2009. “A New Dawn for Citizen Science.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24 (9): 467–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017.


 * Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. 2016. “Dialogue.” http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?ca=571e77ff-2094-45bc-b73a-1030602c82fb&c=78561d10-4570-11e3-91d6-d4ae52a6892e&ch=7a5150d0-4570-11e3-91eb-d4ae52a6892e.


 * Snijder, Ronald. 2015. “Better Sharing Through Licenses? Measuring the Influence of Creative Commons Licenses on the Usage of Open Access Monographs.” Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication 3 (1): 1–21.


 * SPARC. “The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition.” 2016. The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. http://sparcopen.org.


 * Stadler, Claus, Jens Lehmann, Konrad Hoffner, and Soren Auer. 2012. “LinkedGeoData: A Core for a Web of Spatial Open Data.” Semantic Web 0 (1): 1–22. doi:10.3233/SW-2011-0052.


 * Stafford, Amy, Ali Shiri, Stan Ruecker, Matthew Bouchard, Paras Mehta, Karl Anvik, and Ximena Rossello. 2008. “Searchling: User-Centered Evaluation of a Visual Thesaurus-Enhanced Interface for Multilingual Digital Libraries.” In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, 117–21. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin.


 * Stein, Bob. 2015. “Back to the Future.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (2): n.p. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0018.204.


 * Stranack, Kevin. 2008. Starting A New Scholarly Journal in Africa. Public Knowledge Project. https://pkp.sfu.ca/files/AfricaNewJournal.pdf


 * Sturm, Susan, Timothy Eatman, John Saltmarsh, and Adam Bush. 2011. “Full Participation: Building the Architecture for Diversity and Public Engagement in Higher Education.” Center for Institutional and Social Change.


 * Suber, Peter. 2004. “Open Access Overview.” http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm.


 * Suber, Peter. 2005. “Promoting Open Access in the Humanities.” Syllecta Classica 16: 231–46.


 * Surkis, Alisa, and Kevin Read. 2015. “Research Data Management.” Journal of the Medical Library Association 103 (3): 154–56.

T

 * Tambini, Damian. 1999. “New Media and Democracy: The Civic Networking Movement.” New Media & Society 1 (3): 305–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614449922225609.


 * Tanenbaum, Greg. 2014. “North American Campus-Based Open Access Funds: A Five Year Progress Report.” https://sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/OA-Fund-5-Year-Review.pdf.


 * “The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition.” 2016. The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. http://sparcopen.org.


 * Truscello, Michael. 2003. “The Architecture of Information: Open Source Software and Tactical Poststructuralist Anarchism.” Postmodern Culture 13 (1): n.p. http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/issue.503/13.3truscello.html.

U

 * University of Cambridge. “Cambridge Open Research.” 2016. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/research-at-cambridge/open-access.

V

 * Van Aelst, Peter, and Stefaan Walgrave. 2002. “New Media, New Movements? The Role of the Internet in Shaping the ‘Anti-Globalization’ Movement.” Information, Communication & Society 5 (4): 465–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180208538801.


 * Vandegrift, Micah, and Josh Bolick. 2014. “‘Free to All’: Library Publishing and the Challenge of Open Access.” Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication 4 (4): 107–16.


 * Vandendorpe, Christian. 2012. “Wikisource and the Scholarly Book.” Scholarly and Research Communication 3 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/src/index.php/src/article/viewFile/58/146.


 * Van Laer, Jeroen, and Peter Van Aelst. 2010. “Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires: Opportunities and Limitations.” Information, Communication & Society 13 (8): 1146–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003628307.


 * Veletsianos, George. 2015. “A Case Study of Scholars’ Open and Sharing Practices.” Open Praxis 7(3): 199–209.


 * Venugopal, Srikumar, Rajkumar Buyya, and Kotagiri Ramamohanarao. 2006. “A Taxonomy of Data Grids for Distributed Data Sharing, Management, and Processing.” ACM Computing Surveys 38 (1): 1–53. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1132955.


 * Vision, Todd J. 2010. “Open Data and the Social Contract of Scientific Publishing.” BioScience 60 (5): 330–31.http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/60/5/330.full.


 * Von Hippel, Eric, and Georg Von Krogh. 2003. “Open Source Software and the ‘Private-Collective’ Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science.” Organization Science 14 (2): 209–23.


 * Von Krogh, Georg, and Eric Von Hippel. 2006. “The Promise of Research on Open Source Software.” Management Science 52 (7): 975–83.


 * Von Krogh, Georg, Sebastian Spaeth, and Karim R. Lakhani. 2003. “Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study.” Research Policy 32 (7): 1217–41.

W

 * Walsh, Brandon, Claire Maiers, Gwen Nelly, Jeremy Boggs, and Praxis Program Team. 2014. “Crowdsourcing Individual Interpretations: Between Microtasking And Multitasking.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (formerly Literary and Linguistic Computing) 29 (3): 379–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu030.


 * Ward, C., L. Freiman, L. Molloy, S. Jones, and K. Snow. 2011. “Making Sense: Talking Data Management with Researchers.” International Journal of Digital Curation 6 (2): 9–17. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/49201/.


 * Ward, Vicky, Allan House, and Susan Hamer. 2009. “Developing a Framework for Transferring Knowledge into Action: A Thematic Analysis of the Literature.” Journal of Health ServicesResearch & Policy 14 (3): 156–64. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008120.


 * Waters, Donald J., and Joseph S. Meisel. 2007. “2007 Annual Report: Scholarly Publishing Initiatives.” Mellon Foundation.


 * Weber, Steven. 2004. The Success of Open Source. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.


 * West, Joel. 2003. “How Open is Open Enough?: Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies.” Research Policy 32 (7) 1259–85.


 * West, Joel and Scott Gallagher. 2006. “Challenges of Open Innovation: the Paradox of Firm Investment in Open Source Software.” R&D Management 36 (3): 319-331.


 * Whitmer, Ali, Laura Ogden, John Lawton, Pam Sturner, Peter Groffman, Laura Schneider, and David Hart. 2010. “The Engaged University: Providing a Platform for Research that Transforms Society.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8 (6): 314–21.


 * Wiggins, A., and K. Crowston. 2011. “From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science.” In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207.


 * The Wikimedia Foundation. "About." 2018. Wikipedia. April 23. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About.


 * Willinsky, John. 2007. “What Open Access Research Can Do for Wikipedia.” First Monday 12 (3).


 * Willinsky, John. 2006a. “History.” In The Access Principle. Cambridge: MIT Press.


 * Willinsky, John. 2006b. The Access Principle. Cambridge: MIT Press.


 * Willinsky, John. 2003. “The Nine Flavours of Open Access Scholarly Publishing.” Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 49 (3): 263–67.


 * Wilson, James A.J., Luis Martinez-Uribe, Michael A. Frazer, and Paul Jeffereys. 2011. “An Institutional Approach to Developing Research Data Management Infrastructure.” International Journal of Digital Curation 6 (2): 274–87.http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/198.

X

 * Xu, Guan-Hua. 2007. “Open Access to Scientific Data: Promoting Science and Innovation.” Data Science Journal 6 (17): 21–25. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/dsj/6/0/6_0_OD21/_article.

Y

 * Yakel, Elizabeth. 2007. “Digital Curation.” OCLC Systems and Services: International Digital Library Perspectives 23 (4): 335–40. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/10650750710831466.

Z

 * Zheng, Ye, and Yu Li. 2015. “University Faculty Awareness and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing and the Institutional Repository: A Case Study.” Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication 3 (1): 1–29.