Help talk:Glossary

#book
I'm wondering if this should say something about the coherence of the modules of a book, at least distantly echoing that point made at WB:WIW. Care needs to be taken to avoid implying a greater (as well as lesser) exclusion than we actually apply. (Come to think of it, maybe that item in the policy could use clarification.) --Pi zero (talk) 13:16, 6 November 2010 (UTC)


 * That entry was already either on this page or the "glossary of Wikibooks jargon" page that I merged in here. Certainly there may be a possibility of better phrasing and I hope it's not a stretch to say that I believe you have the eloquence to find the ideal wording. – Adrignola talk 13:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC)