Foundations and Assessment of Education/Edition 1/Foundations Table of Contents/Chapter 3/The Scoop From Someone Who Knows/Peer Review Two

Part 3 - "2+2"
List TWO compliments and TWO suggestions about the article content
 * Hints:
 * Focus on the work, not the person
 * Describe "There is...", "I see.." rather than judge "You didn't..."

Compliments  . THE ARTICLE WAS NOT CROWDED WITH DISTRACTING OR OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE WHICH MADE IT VERY EASY TO READ AND FOLLOW. . THE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS ASKES WERE IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER WHICH WERE GOOD BECAUSE THEY FOLLOWED THE HISTORY OF THE CHANGE IN EDUCATION.

 Suggestions  . INCLUDE FACTUAL DATA FROM THE EDUCATION BOARD AND ASSOCIATIONS THAT CAN BE PRESENTED TO THE EXPERTS. INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION ALONG WITH THE ANSWERS FROM THE EXPERTS. . STATE YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE ANSWERS PROVIDED BY THE EXPERTS, ADD SOME COLOR AND DESIGN TO THE ARTICLE TO MAKE IT MORE PRESENTABLE AND APPEALING TO THE EYE. . GET ONE OR MORE EXPERTS TO INTERVIEW AND THAT CAN OFFER DIFFERENT VIEWS AND PERSPECTIVES ON THE TOPIC. 

You can make compliments and suggestions that relate to specific areas of the paper or to the paper in general. I suggest a mixture of both. Focus on what's most important. Of course, you can also include more than two suggestions and more than two compliments. The goal is to help the author improve his/her article.