Category talk:Wikibooks draft policies and guidelines

Proposal for the 43rd week of 2006
For next week (23rd to 29th of October) I suggest we do one of the "first generation" ones from the old proposed policy category that are still in the proposed stage: I'm fine with either, but wouldn't mind looking at the Image use policy as I'd like to have a look at licenses. --Swift 22:23, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Annotated texts instructional materials that are source texts with additional content added
 * 2) Image use policy mostly about image format and wikicode

Proposal for the 42nd week of 2006
There was a bit of a misunderstanding last week with Categories and Profanity+No offensive usernames both being nominated. For this week, I suggest: --Swift 06:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Given that the latter pair is pretty much ready, but some crazy nutter deceided to add comments so late (again, I'm sorry  ) we give it a few more days for consensus to be reached.
 * 2) Put Categories formally in the spotlight for this week ending on the 22nd.
 * 3) Do some house-cleaning and put No offensive usernames and No personal attacks up for rejection as they are now covered by Be civil.


 * I completely forgot to make a PotW last night, and I had planned on doing it. Oh well, so long as people are still remembering to work on old policy proposals, i'm fine with it. I have a few comments about your proposal:
 * No offensive usernames should be rejected, all the important content of that has since been merged into Profanity.
 * Profanity should be enforced. I would like to move to make it so this week.
 * No personal attacks can probably be rejected, because most of the material is already covered by Be civil, and Profanity.
 * Categories is still a draft, and I don't think it is ready for a decision one way or the other quite yet. The idea behind my PotW nominations has been to clear out old proposals, and make final decisions on those proposals. I don't think we should use it as a tool for shot-gunning through new proposals until the community has had plenty of time to read them over.
 * Thanks for keeping the spotlight on our policy proposals. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 15:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, going back through the records, I see that No personal attacks was in the process of being moved to policy, but people seem to have lost interest in the process. I have started a new movement to enforce that policy, because it seems like we should have done it in the past. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 15:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't see much left to do with Profanity but given that we've all been on the last moment choosing new ones, perhaps a quiet week to get back on track is a good idea.
 * Good point about the young age of Categories. I guess there is no rush. --Swift 22:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, I'm just going to be bold and update this to this week's PotW. --Swift 04:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)